Nonsense about employing only allowed for people from Europe previously - in fact downright dishonest.
The cap of 20,700 workers per year put on by the EU was lifted after Brexit enabling more skilled workers to enter the Uk.
Nonsense about employing only allowed for people from Europe previously - in fact downright dishonest.
would you be able to point to the EU rule which prevented Dyson from employing people form outside of Europe....s James Dyson pointed out this morning,
"We can employ people from all over the world
previously we were only allowed to employ people from Europe and we couldn't get the engineers we needed.
we now have 60 different nationalities now on our Wiltshire site.
Would you be kindly point out which EU prevented that..." Freedom from the EU allowed Oxford scientists to develop a world beating covid 19 vaccine"
Had we been part of the EU we would not have had freedom of mind under their control.
Sorry but is this supposed to be encouraging news?
Perhaps you should study the bottom line.
I think you may be confused by a rule set up by the UK government:The cap of 20,700 workers per year put on by the EU was lifted after Brexit enabling more skilled workers to enter the Uk.
Though you might wish to look at the figures for February.
yes it shows an increase -but starting from the very low Jan figures
I am not sure where the EU "kept quiet" about any wall?Or if you keep quiet as the EU did when they built a 'wall' (financial) in Turkey and Libya to keep out the migrants. Then everyone will be busy focussing their venom on Trump for shouting about his wall.
Exports of goods to the EU, excluding non-monetary gold and other precious metals, partially rebounded in February 2021, increasing by £3.7 billion (46.6%)
He must have his facts confused. I work for a US multinational in Dublin and we have - at last count pre-pandemic - 63 nationalities working in the office with us, and not in a token way either, my team was less than half Irish, everyone else was Italian and French and Greek. Looking round the office, you had people from all over - Chinese, Indian, Kenyan, American, English, Polish, Russian, and on and on.As James Dyson pointed out this morning,
"We can employ people from all over the world
previously we were only allowed to employ people from Europe and we couldn't get the engineers we needed.
we now have 60 different nationalities now on our Wiltshire site.
he also said
" Freedom from the EU allowed Oxford scientists to develop a world beating covid 19 vaccine"
Had we been part of the EU we would not have had freedom of mind under their control.
Pre brexit argument No1 top of the charts was "these forriners coming here and taking our jobs"........
The covid-19 vaccines are a poster child for the benefits of giving immigrants an even chance with everyone else. And AZ is a poster child for cooperation within the EU.
I'm a bit confused!
Also, it's hard to not crack up over the AZ comment, because AstraZeneca is a British-Swedish company, whose CEO is French and they worked with Italian pharmaceutical factories to do all the initial manufacturing for developement. Meanwhile the foundational theory behind mRNA vaccines as a whole was developed in the US by a Hungarian immigrant, Moderna was founded by a Canadian who arrived in Canada as a child as a refugee from Beirut and their CEO is a French immigrant, and the Pfizer vaccine, while financed in the US, was developed by Turkish immigrants to Germany (in Berlin) and manufactured in Belgium
As I said in the post, “The vast majority of eu immigrants are hard working, pleasant and a great benefit to uk. I have yet to meet one that did not fall in to this category.”Was this down to any personal experience or just media reports?
Speaking for myself I've never had the slightest problem with any immigrant I've encountered, directly or indirectly. In fact quite the opposite they all seemed to be doing useful and essential jobs.
I've always believed the whole "problem" was a fiction.
Actually there was no hidden agenda in my post, I just thought the Monty python reference amusing.How's that building concensous going Robin?
If you can't let "all brexiteers are racists and don't want Johnny forrriner here" go, then your previous, quite sensible post was just nothing but a showboating exercise!!
A doubling of the numbers of people coming in to the country is a significant change and not something that has been sensibly debated as to the implications
I have watched the video rather than read reports of what Dyson said. Dyson talked about Brexit giving us an independance of spirit and gave the example of the AZ vaccine. He talked about us not being able to be part of the european development of a vaccine. But the only vaccine developed in Europe I know of is Phizer and that is German. He referred to AZ as a British company when I thought AZ was a Swedish British company. The AZ vaccine was developed when we were in the transition period, following all the EE rules, but the interviewer did not ask that question. How on Earth leaving the EU helped with developing the AZ vaccine I do not know.As James Dyson pointed out this morning,
"We can employ people from all over the world
previously we were only allowed to employ people from Europe and we couldn't get the engineers we needed.
we now have 60 different nationalities now on our Wiltshire site.
he also said
" Freedom from the EU allowed Oxford scientists to develop a world beating covid 19 vaccine"
Had we been part of the EU we would not have had freedom of mind under their control.
I think you need to provide a proper justification of this statement. My understanding is that the EU had no juristiction over immigrants from outside the EU coming in to a member state.The cap of 20,700 workers per year put on by the EU was lifted after Brexit enabling more skilled workers to enter the Uk.
People have been struggling to make a sensible debate about immigration but it has been overwhelmed by anti-immigration lobby hysteria, making claim after claim, strongly tinged with racism, which was the driving force behind brexit......A doubling of the numbers of people coming in to the country is a significant change and not something that has been sensibly debated as to the implications.
Enter your email address to join: