After all would you rather have a Wadkin Burgessgreen or a Charnwood?
You need to understand the reason behind this process. Due to the fact that most large retailers have loss leaders and low profit margins they have to make their money somewhere. They do this by selling FS (Financial Services), as you describe as "annoying". To some it is an irritation, but to many it gives them them a benefit. The unfortunate underlying issues that are far worse than the approach to the customer is the awful draconian deceitful methods the retail companies impose on their staff of which the public are unaware. I.e. performance managing and Mystery Shoppers whereby the Managers have to meet targets for selling so many cards and insurances per month otherwise they are threatened on a monthly basis to be performance managed with the threat of losing their jobs. Along with that they have to endure Mystery Shoppers who are third party entities and could be anyone picked off the street whom may even have a gripe with the specific store they are investigating, enter the stores unannounced and incognito filming the transaction and then if the member of staff fails to ask the customer if they want any FS (along with did they smile or did they offer you accessories) then the staff member is reported and the manager once again has their head on the block because they are considered responsible even though they had nothing to do with the actual transaction.do they still do that annoying thing were the staff try to foist an extended guarantee that costs close to purchase price?
It perhaps reinforces the need for fora like this where there may at least be a moderately informed consensus emerging from like minded people about which products, services etc are best or to be avoided.
Companies need to stop price matching on appliances.
We used a local company for many years, probably £50-£75K a year of business. In the end they went bust. Talking to the owner he acknowledged that price matching had killed the business. Often selling stuff at a loss. He said how can I price match against AO when what we sell is a day or less sales for them
As a former (retired as soon as I was financially comfortable) high street retailer, I disagree in part.
What I always offered was to price match if possible & if not offer the best price I could.
This satisfied most customers.
What WAS frustrating were those who bought online because they thought it was bound to be cheaper than buying locally & didn't bother checking.
I'll admit to a small amount of satisfaction when they came in for something else, glanced at my price on the item they'd bought & were dismayed to note it was significantly less than they had paid.
We could also have a look at the idea that the current financial environment will exacerbate the decline of the high street: the small retailer will have higher costs and less access to government money than the large retailers, which will mean more fold, so less choice and higher prices for the consumer. If the large chains also go by the board then we will be left with Amazon and Wish. The internet is a weird place where monopoly seems to be the default position. Monopoly is a fabulous idea for the monopolist, but absolutely awful for everyone else.
Given that governments seem to think that planned economies are the new big thing, expect more monopolies and cartels. Free markets have always been a bit of a pipe dream, but are now looking to be virtually extinct.
Why? Many city office blocks are in great areas, very highly specified. You can walk or cycle to many local attractions. Prices will shoot down once freeholders realise they have a glut. We are always being told we need lots of new homes. Here we have them, already built - just needing a fit out.
I recently sold up, but I had three floors of a 6 story building in the City. I would happily live there. It will revitalise city centres, but the unimaginative politicians have not woken up yet.
Not sure it will be that far off ... Property Funds are under significant pressure for liquidity on redemptions already.I used to own a property development business (sold a good few years ago) and the current environment might tempt me back. However, leveraging opportunities are not there yet for the small developer. It needs city office property prices to crash first. I suspect this may well happen, but people are still optimistic thus far into the pandemic.
I agree really. The issue I see is that planning policy has typically taken a while to change and finance will be an issue for at least two years. Hence I am being conservative. I think our Agent Provocateur has a point, but in my world pretty much everyone over 30 that I employed, had moved into commuter zones to have children and a garden. Only the 20-30 staff lived in London as such. 90% of them rented. There is an opportunity here I feel. But I think I will probably keep further thoughts to myself now.Not sure it will be that far off ... Property Funds are under significant pressure for liquidity on redemptions already.
Enter your email address to join: