phil.p":1flakkm1 said:Yes. Great shame someone lost.
Stanleymonkey":7zhw3quo said:Apparently Stokes shouted at the umpires to not add the 4 runs to the English score.
Stanleymonkey":3noqtsmy said:byes are unintentional deflections that go for runs.......
MikeG.":rlco57ql said:Stanleymonkey":rlco57ql said:byes are unintentional deflections that go for runs.......
No they're not. Not unless things have changed. Overthrows are just runs. Byes are mistakes by the 'keeper (ie a ball that goes through to the keeper without touching bat or batsman, which isn't a wide, and which results in runs).
Lonsdale73":1p2a93re said:.........Pakistan must be seething.
Lonsdale73":1scdh9ie said:For someone with a surfeit of tools you seem short of some truly square.
OscarG":195ads12 said:I've seen something about the application of rules that's up for debate but not regarding the super-over.
Ben Stokes' 2 that turned into a 6: There's an umpire who thinks a strict application of the rules means it should have been 5 not 6.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-7247983/Should-England-given-five-runs-Ben-Stokes-LUCKY-six.html
What do you think?
Enter your email address to join: