Cheshirechappie
Established Member
lurker":iadww5rc said:Cheshirechappie":iadww5rc said:Cause here for a little glimmer of cautious optimism. The Los Angeles Times reports that a Nobel Laureate chemist has been looking at the Coronavirus figures, and suggests that the pandemic may not be quite as serious or long-lasting as some of the doom mongers are predicting. He does say that control of infection rates will be influenced heavily by social distancing measures, but they may help very significantly in quick control. The article also compares flu death rates in the USA (which go virtually unreported) with the daily media sensationalism around Covid 19.
It might just be that the Prime Minister's suggestion that 12 weeks will be enough to significantly control the epidemic may not be wholly misplaced.
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2 ... l-laureate
You said chemist and I thought they would know nothing about this.
But the article says he is a bio physicist so he probably does.
Yes, he's a biophysicist. His Nobel prize is in chemistry, though. Not sure how that works, but there it is.