Chestnut bowl

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Dalboy

Established Member
Joined
18 Sep 2008
Messages
3,930
Reaction score
298
Location
Canterbury United Kingdom
Todays little effort from the workshop a small chestnut burr, Finished with sander sealer and buffed on a three wheel buffer. Measures 6" X 3 1/4". I had to tidy the top rim up as a piece broke off making it look untidy for a natural edge

C & C welcome

DSCF0675 (800x565).jpg

DSCF0676 (800x565).jpg

DSCF0677 (800x565).jpg

DSCF0679 (800x600).jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0675 (800x565).jpg
    DSCF0675 (800x565).jpg
    80.4 KB
  • DSCF0676 (800x565).jpg
    DSCF0676 (800x565).jpg
    91.9 KB
  • DSCF0677 (800x565).jpg
    DSCF0677 (800x565).jpg
    85.9 KB
  • DSCF0679 (800x600).jpg
    DSCF0679 (800x600).jpg
    82.3 KB
Looks good regardless of the loss of edge, always a presentation dilemma I find when betwixt natural and machined edge.

What really grates with me is when burrs are 'salvaged' by someone wielding a chainsaw leaving flat edges that preclude the most pleasing presentation.
 
Looks really nice - lovely piece of timber.

By way of constructive critism, it may be the photo but the foot could be made crisper for me. I’d be tempted to keep the flow of the bowl under the piece and make a sharper transition for the foot?

However, that is minor, great piece and thanks for posting.

Simon.
 
Maybe this show the foot a little better the bowl was intended to flow down to the foot by the means of a small ogee shape.

Thank you for the observation

DSCF0678 (800x565).jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0678 (800x565).jpg
    DSCF0678 (800x565).jpg
    89.5 KB
I see the ogee. More of a personal / philosophical point. I struggle when the line of the bowl / foot is ‘into’ the table or surface. I prefer to see the line of curve flow extend to a tangent / asymptote to a surface rather than a hard end to the flow.
 
SVB":2klfoq5x said:
I see the ogee. More of a personal / philosophical point. I struggle when the line of the bowl / foot is ‘into’ the table or surface. I prefer to see the line of curve flow extend to a tangent / asymptote to a surface rather than a hard end to the flow.

For most bowls that is what I do but thought I would try a different approach with this one and the walnut one I have just finished
 
I like the angle of the foot on the bowl. When it gets anything beyond 90 degrees between the table and the foot of the bowl (if that makes sense) I generally find it clumsy-looking - tho just a chamfer to the point of contact can compensate for this.

Not sure this post's clear to me, let alone anyone else.

edit:
_MG_7863.jpg
 

Attachments

  • _MG_7863.jpg
    _MG_7863.jpg
    93.9 KB
Chris152":87zbxvz7 said:
I like the angle of the foot on the bowl. When it gets anything beyond 90 degrees between the table and the foot of the bowl (if that makes sense) I generally find it clumsy-looking - tho just a chamfer to the point of contact can compensate for this.

Not sure this post's clear to me, let alone anyone else.

edit:

Normally I use a very small foot which is tucked under the piece so it is not seen this gives the impression of the item floating and the other is a curve so that it appears as if the item is sitting in the surface.

Thank you for your thoughts all the same
 

Latest posts

Back
Top