Eric The Viking
Established Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 6,599
- Reaction score
- 76
I very much doubt it matters. What is important is not creating excessive back-pressure. If overall the outlet (available for airflow) diameter increases with respect to the spigot on the machine, it should be fine.Moonsafari69":19brrbrk said:...having the uninterrupted straight path for the air-flow I think is really important
The higher the frequency of sound, the more directional it is & the more it is attenuated (reduced) by the environment, e.g. distance in dry air, walls, soft surfaces, etc.). The motor isn't stressed by noise suppression, only by stalling and overheating. You're not doing either of those things.
I've only had a vac motor fail once, which was when our cleaner, who's wonderful in every other respect and very mechanically adroit (she comes from a family of amateur mechanics), mistook our vac for a wet+dry variety and soaked the motor. It still ran for several years afterwards, but the damage was done and the bearings eventually failed.
I do clean out my Earlex motor's impellor, about once or twice yearly, as crud builds up on the vanes, and that unbalances it and reduces its efficiency, causing overheating. A very nice Mr. Maskery recently provided me with a cyclone, so once that's working for things like the chop saw and the router table, it probably won't need much attention at all. When it's dirty it does get VERY noisy though - it really screams to let me know. I'm expecting that it's eventual failure will be bearings, although it might be brush/commutator wear.
I assume the Camvac has brushed, i.e. "universal," motor(s). Is that correct?