Looks fantastic. What are you intending to build with it? I just finished my very much lower key MFTC and am finding it a bit of a revelation when it comes to building cabinets.
I like the removable metal working vice idea too, I've been wondering what to do with mine so that's definitely a possibility - do you find its held securely enough just with dogs?
How crucial is the 96mm spacing? I would guess the expansion and contraction of the timber across that span would throw out the 96mm by at least a couple of mm at the extremes? For cross cutting that wouldn’t be an issue, but for 45° cuts they would be off, right?
The majority of European cabinet work is using a 32mm spacing. So everything is a multiple of 32. Hence the 96mm spacing. As you say though any consistent spacing is going to work just fine for generating right angles and straight lines.I cannot see a specific reason to have 96mm spacing. I am sure that 100mm would work just as well. The 96mm was devised by Festool for a reason, but I do not know what it was.
I would argue that the 96mm is commonly used as this is a perpetuation of the jigs and guides for making a MFT. This was the case for mine.
Regards from Perth
Derek
Is it? Why?The majority of European cabinet work is using a 32mm spacing.
96/94mm means to me the finished size of sawn 4" timber for a lot of purposes. Hence 2x4" comes out as 44x94mm ish if you are lucky.So everything is a multiple of 32. Hence the 96mm spacing. As you say though any consistent spacing is going to work just fine for generating right angles and straight lines.
So that parts from different manufacturers work together. Is standardisation…Is it? Why?
Right. Thanks for that. Seems to be several systems mentioned there, all competing for attention.So that parts from different manufacturers work together. Is standardisation…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/32_mm_cabinetmaking_system
I’m a hobbyist but have made a fair few kitchen and bathroom cabinets using the system. It makes life very easy. For a professional for sure it’s going to save a lot of time.Right. Thanks for that. Seems to be several systems mentioned there, all competing for attention.
Are they relevant to the typical one-man-band woodworkers we see on this forum?
"Standardisation" is old, useful and well established British Standards - Wikipedia but that's a different thing.
There are idealistic design notions such as Corbusier's "modulor" Modulor - Wikipedia, or the ancient golden ratio, megalithic yard, metric, imperial, etc etc
Seem to be as more alternative "rationalised" systems than you could shake a stick at!
...
As for these holes - why not just drill them as and when you need them? That's what I do and my old bench had about 6 randomly distributed holes and one 32mm square planing stop. My new one just has the planing stop and no holes yet
This question caught my eye, and therefore I think that an MFT that is to be used for accurate tracksaw cuts needs to be sheet goods based, but I would very much like something more traditional looking. I would like to be persuaded that solid timber is ok for an MFT .I would guess the expansion and contraction of the timber across that span would throw out the 96mm by at least a couple of mm at the extremes? For cross cutting that wouldn’t be an issue, but for 45° cuts they would be off, right?
Sorry to be boring but it's always been perfectly possible to make a straight cut with a tracksaw, without any sort of special table. If short of space I definitely wouldn't bother - just lay a sheet of MDF over your normal bench.I have been watching this with interest as I will soon be embarking on my first workbench build. A single car garage workshop necessitates efficiency and so I would like to combine an MFT workbench with a hand tool workbench to allow me to primarily use tracksaw over tablesaw whilst still having the convenience of work holding.
This question caught my eye, and therefore I think that an MFT that is to be used for accurate tracksaw cuts needs to be sheet goods based, but I would very much like something more traditional looking. I would like to be persuaded that solid timber is ok for an MFT .
Nobody has said any different. It’s an aid to square, not straight. And yes it’s possible to cut square without a MFT but the MFT removes any ambiguity and adds repeatability.Sorry to be boring but it's always been perfectly possible to make a straight cut with a tracksaw, without any sort of special table. If short of space I definitely wouldn't bother - just lay a sheet of MDF over your normal bench.
Enter your email address to join: