Two thing:
You can't assume the OP is and will still be a hobbyist, and secondly, he mentions capacity as a factor, hence I feel he is better of with the two fantastic (and hammer machines are superb) tools rather than mid-range axminster gear.
I always look to the future - what if the OP goes on to do commercial pieces, what if his work demands better machines down the line? He would then have to sell the mid-range stuff and replace with the higher capacity machines which he could have bought to start with.
The budget is immaterial in this context as the OP has stated that he has that to spend so why not get the best for the money rather than making compromising right from the outset.
I really wished I had the cash to get the Hammer P/T after my experiences with el-rusto, but i'm lumped with it now so have to spend a bunch of time getting it to do what I wanted it to do - whereas with the Hammer, there is a lot less setup involved and a much better machine at the heart of it.
Who's to say a Hobbyist can't have top of the range tools, isn't this just the same as a person who buys Lie-Nielsen planes that almost everyone on here either owns, aspires to own or recommends to people? Stanleys or Records would be adequate, but if you have the budget, then why not get the best?