Baby Rattles

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

wizer

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2005
Messages
15,589
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys

Next on the list is a baby rattle for impending birth of niece or nephew. I want it to be the type with a filled head rather than captured rings. What process do I need to go through making it? Just make it like a box, then glue it together. Will I need to make one of those jubilee clip chucks?

Any info appreciated.
 
I remember DuncanH making one of those Tom,very nice it was too.
Might be worth a look at his site.

Here they are Tom.
Sorry can't help with the making though.
 
Thanks Paul, that's exactly the style I want.
 
I made one - with tips folowing a guide I found somewhere (Ozzie/NZ site perhaps?) ... 2 pieces like making a round "box" for the rattle, then filled with rice/beans and glued shut ... but also bored a hole in the "base" which I then made a spindle handle to fit in as aplu and glued that in as well.

I think it was a well received present - he could rattle it on his own or hit his irritating older sisters with it ... RESULT!
 
If you go to a craft shop or habidasher, some have packs of little coloured bells, they don't cost much, and I think a few of those would sound good. :-k
 
I've made a few, as linked to by Paul.
The first ones I did were the ones with the ribbons and I used a similar technique to one demoed at our club several years ago by a turner who I can't remember.

He made the sphere and hollowed it through the hole where the handle fits using small hollowing tools. He drilled holes round the outside as a guide to uniform wall thickness.

I thought the hollowing was just making the job more complex than it needed to be so I made the sphere as I would a box and then glued it to the handle.
I originally put the holes around the outside as a guide to get uniform wall thickness but have since been told by my brother (whose twins received the first rattles) that the holes are a good feature as they give the baby something to focus on and perhaps keep them interested beyond the rattle noise. The wire burns and decorative beads were originally placed to hide how the rattles were put together but I guess that they also are good for provided visual stimulation.

The disadvantage to making the sphere as a box is that the glue join is a potential area of weakness and when the rattle gets dropped the join is subject to shock. Make sure the join is strong and that you use a decent glue. It's more of a problem if you try to keep the grain matching as much as possible by using a small overlap for the join. These days I don't make the join as you would for a box, but use a second piece of wood inside which I can overlap as much as I want. I also make the lower part of the sphere as part of the handle so there's only one glue join (at the centre of the sphere)

When I posted my first attempts on a US forum it was immediately pointed out that they do not meet US safety standards for rattles - the handles can fit down the baby's throat. As far as I can tell (from research online) there are no such restrictions in the UK, but to be on the safe side I now only make them with flared handles. I much prefer the traditional handles though.

For the rattling parts I use small bells from the local craft shop but I did once use lentils - this was for a rattle without holes so I didn't worry about them getting too wet from baby drool!

It goes without saying that you should use a safe timber and a food safe finish - I use a mix of bees wax and carnauba wax and tell the parent that the shine will fade quickly after being stuck in the baby's mouth. Is there an alternative safe finish that would keep it's shine?

The feedback I get from buyers is that the rattles are a big hit. One said that the baby preferred it to all the other (plastic) ones that they had - I guess it's something to do with plastic being cold (?)

One last thought - make a few test ones and when they're done try hitting them against a few different surfaces to check the your construction technique can take some rough handling.

Anyway, good luck.

Duncan
 
Thanks for that Duncan. I'm going to start having a go tomorrow. To be honest I'm a bit nervous about getting it right. I want it to be quite small too. More of a gift not to be used.

Have you got any in stock? If it goes pear shaped then I could be in the market for one ;)
 
Thanks for asking but, unfortunately, I don't have any ready and my lathe is broken (has been for 3 weeks and will be at least 3 weeks before repair :( )

One of the beauties of making them is that they don't use much timber and they're pretty quick to make, so if it goes wrong you haven't lost much.

I've just remembered that for the first 2 I made I constructed a cardboard template to make sure I got the sphere more or less right.

One mistake I've made with them is making them too big and chunky - they look ok on the lathe but it's hard to appreciate the scale without taking them off and holding them
 
Wizer,

my kids have all played with something like this:

std_P1010103.JPG


Mine has 3 captive rings which could be moved right up and down the toy. They liked them because the ends were large enough for them to suck and chew on without the whole lot going in their mouths.

It's a nice toy that will cause no harm even if it does break (but they've never managed to break mine).

Dave
 
Hi Wizer, I have made a few like the picture here, they are always ornamental due to the timbers used (purpleheart for this one) so more for the parents to keep rather then being drooled over, by the child anyway!... making it involves a lot of reverse or re-chucking and is really a boxed goblet! with or without the rings ( I use old allen keys ground down and handled to part the rings off and fill the head with a mixture of dried beans/lentils checking the sound before sealing the end together, hope this helps, I might be too late?
 
Back
Top