MIGNAL":qbx32g42 said:
snip . . . I only used the 7/8 th's in paring fashion. . .
Ah, I get the idea - you keep one and pass the rest on as I got the 1 1/2", 1" and 1/8" in the post this morning :wink:
Here are the MKII 1 1/2", my MKI 3/4" and the MKII 1"
This gives a good idea about one of the changes that has taken place - the handle size. I think that it is now only the 3 largest chisels that have the large handle. I have to say, that I do prefer the small diameter handle - it fits much more comfortably in the hand especially when paring and makes the chisel more controllable.
When I compared the MKII's with some of my other chisels, I noticed that the 1" seemed to be narrow and found that it actually measures 23.9mm across which is quite a significant difference to the 25mm or 1" that is marked on the packaging. The 1 1/2" or 37mm is actually 38.0mm and the 1/8" or 3mm is 3.07mm at the tip tapering to 2.76mm near the handle. The two larger chisels are parallel along there length. If used as paring chisels the difference in the width probably won't be an issue, but these are sold to be used for both paring and chopping. Personally, I would expect that a 1" chisel would be more or less 25.4mm wide - 1.5mm out is quite a difference. That said, compared to my only MKI AI chisel, these are better in that at least the sides are parallel - my 3/4" is 19.0mm at the tip going up to 19.5mm at the handle end - no wonder it is difficult to get out of a mortice!
While on the subject of tolerances, the backs of the MKII's are a huge improvement over my MKI which is still not flat after much time spent trying. I haven't touched the back of the MKII, although apparently someone has, but it is clear that it is infinitely better than the MKI.
Aside from the handles, the chisels themselves are quite different in form from the MKI. The MKI is much more of a paring chisel having quite a thin cross section along the whole length of the blade. The MKII in contrast is much more of a traditional bevel edge chisel shape.
The big difference however is in the side bevels - the brochure states, "The side bevels are taken down to almost nothing . . ." and this is certainly true. This makes them quite usable as dovetail chisels - the 1/8" is almost identical in form to my 3mm Japanese dovetail chisel.
In conclusion, if I were in the market for some decent paring or dovetail chisels I would certainly consider these as they feel nice to hold and appear to be well made. As an all round chisel, if the width issue is resolved they would also be well worth considering.
I unfortunately don't have time to test them to see how the edge holds up in use but perhaps someone else will be able to comment on this.
Cheers,
Steve