I was pleased to find a copy of this useful little publication in a local secondhand book shop today.
It's from a series of Woodworker handbooks that went through successive updatings; I think this edition is probably from about a century ago, so I expect to find it full of useful advice.
This is what it says (with admirable brevity) about the kit of tools:
A pretty minimal kit, with no surprises - except for that bit about the 2 foot rule. Why did Scottish woodworkers prefer a 3 foot rule? Are their trees all taller? Do they just want to be better equipped than the English?
Can anyone offer anything in support of this odd statement? I can say that 2 foot folding rules seem much commoner than 3 foot ones in my tool shopping - is it the other way around in Scotland?
It's from a series of Woodworker handbooks that went through successive updatings; I think this edition is probably from about a century ago, so I expect to find it full of useful advice.
This is what it says (with admirable brevity) about the kit of tools:
A pretty minimal kit, with no surprises - except for that bit about the 2 foot rule. Why did Scottish woodworkers prefer a 3 foot rule? Are their trees all taller? Do they just want to be better equipped than the English?
Can anyone offer anything in support of this odd statement? I can say that 2 foot folding rules seem much commoner than 3 foot ones in my tool shopping - is it the other way around in Scotland?