matt":370v3h66 said:Calpol":370v3h66 said:Only 5% of accidents are caused by breaking the speed limit compared to 32% for people not looking properly, which in my experience is usually the doddlers...
Cool. Stay within the speed limit and 5% fewer accidents. Implies that slower driving could equal even fewer accidents except, of course, there are those that would argue someone else's slower speed was the cause of their accident because they were "forced" to overtake. But then the act of overtaking is rooted in wanting to drive faster so back to speed being a cause of accidents.
Jake":2tyaspth said:Speed is obviously a contributing factor to accidents - in the absence of any speed, there wouldn't be any accidents. Your argument supports a universal 0mph limit.
RogerS":5sj58s5x said:matt":5sj58s5x said:Calpol":5sj58s5x said:Only 5% of accidents are caused by breaking the speed limit compared to 32% for people not looking properly, which in my experience is usually the doddlers...
Cool. Stay within the speed limit and 5% fewer accidents. Implies that slower driving could equal even fewer accidents except, of course, there are those that would argue someone else's slower speed was the cause of their accident because they were "forced" to overtake. But then the act of overtaking is rooted in wanting to drive faster so back to speed being a cause of accidents.
Woah...what's wrong with wanting to drive at the speed limit (all things being equal)...ie to use your words.. 'to drive faster' ?
TobyT":zn8qsdma said:Unfortunately, due to pesky physics, the potential energy of a moving object increase with the square of the speed.
An art that the local instructors seem not to pass on around here. You see drivers tailgating a tractor so that when they do attempt to overtake they end up creeping past, which with our narrow roads is not always a safe thing to do.needs some forward planning
Enter your email address to join: