Search results

What is wrong with that? Like most things in life, nuance and detail are important.

Rishi "delivering for the British people"

give it a rest Jacob, Corbyn lost twice, Starmer won with 412 MPs move on, theres a good chap

have any examples of Tories appointing anybody that wasnt a mate or a supporter of the brexit con, or vested self interest I can think of many examples of tories appointing people completely lacking suitable expertise: David Frost as brexit secretary -a person with zero experience in trade...

The new Labour government are doing something which is obvious yet not something we have seen for the last 14 years: They are putting people with actual experience in cabinet positions and advisors James Timpson: Minister of state for prisons Patrick Vallance: Minister of State for Science...

nah the "state" chooses contracts based on who donates to the party and which MP makes some money out of it there is a reason why so many Conservative MPs have connections to private health care.........and its not quality, price, quantity...

Do you have evidence or is that just an opinion? Many climate protestors do as much as they can to minimise their carbon footprint, for example many avoid flying

The information presented on .gov sites since 2019 has been propaganda The data maybe true, but it has been cherry picked and presented in a way to give a false impression. If you want a lengthy and detailed analysis I can do that, but TLDR I can tell you brexit info on .gov websites is not an...

I understand the logic here. Are you saying rehabilitation increases crime? What makes you think early release / lowering rate of imprisonment makes the streets less safe.

I see what what you did there :ROFLMAO:

It is not an empty assertion .gov websites are propaganda outlets since Boris Johnson took power in 2019 Brexit trade figures for example…..they dishonestly quote them without adjusting for inflation. Brexit was a massive con.

Not true No they aren’t - it’s Brexit propaganda

You may not have heard them………..

there is lots of muttering about vote share Ive noticed amongst pundits ...because labour as we know have won a large majority with not many votes personally I think that is a good thing as that will mean MPs cant be complacent because if they only have a few thousand buffer, they easily lose...

No, that was the left that did that, people like Owen Jones.

It depends how many of the ERG nutters are left. My money is on them trying to be more racist, more hateful than Reform to try and get those voters back. Silly as the bulk of Conservatives are traditional slightly right of centre Tories who believe in honour and decency. Compare the words by...

:ROFLMAO: and the positives are................

It is actually not a great result for Labour, I know they got a lot of seats, but lots of the gains are a result of Reform splitting the right wing vote with 4 million votes.

I dont know much about Green candidates or where they were campaigning, but it seems an awful shame they didnt get more MPs.

it was hilarious last night on sky, they went to talk to Angela Rayner who was outside.......in Manchester... in the rain it was bucketing off her umbrella. everywhere else seemed dry