Phil Pascoe
Established Member
I think he meant the Welsh. God help us."They"?
I think he meant the Welsh. God help us."They"?
At one camera site in particular there were few accidents ......... until the camera was installed. It's a revenue camera, not a speed or safety camera
Fair point on the lignite mines, but that still doesn't mean we should stop trying to mitigate climate change. There seems to be a widely held belief that because some countries are not pulling their weight on this, neither should we. If that holds true, nothing ever changes - imagine if we'd thought that about slavery...Europe is not. Germany for one is opening lignite mines.
More slaves now than ever before, nothing changed.Fair point on the lignite mines, but that still doesn't mean we should stop trying to mitigate climate change. There seems to be a widely held belief that because some countries are not pulling their weight on this, neither should we. If that holds true, nothing ever changes - imagine if we'd thought that about slavery...
?More slaves now than ever before, nothing changed.
It was proved. Accidents increased by something like 65%. Sorry you don't like it.
Amazing how they keep churning out the same nonsense!
Fair point, but I object to the ridiculous belief that we will somehow lead the rest of the world to the moral high ground.. The rest of the world couldn't give a tinker's cuss what we do.There seems to be a widely held belief that because some countries are not pulling their weight on this, neither should we. If that holds true, nothing ever changes - imagine if we'd thought that about slavery...
Nobody has said that. It's just another of your little fantasies.Fair point, but I object to the ridiculous belief that we will somehow lead the rest of the world to the moral high ground..
Wrong. Everybody is watching everybody.The rest of the world couldn't give a tinker's cuss what we do.
I don't believe it. Do you have any evidence?It was proved. Accidents increased by something like 65%. Sorry you don't like it.
Well, in a socialist society perhaps! Where the state knows best and its citizens are kept under control. But, you live in a democracy and what you’re suggesting is just wrong. We are back to your I think it, so it must be.We don't rule by plebiscite, politicians are our representatives, not delegates, and they don't need a mandate on every issue.
In fact they are supposed to stay well ahead of the mob and make intelligent decisions, ignoring the braying from un-woke world of donkeys and Daily Mail readers.
Manifestos are a statement of intent rather than a direct contract. Obvious really or they would have to run into thousands of pages.
Even if that's the case, maybe sometimes we should do things just because we know they're the right things to do...Fair point, but I object to the ridiculous belief that we will somehow lead the rest of the world to the moral high ground.. The rest of the world couldn't give a tinker's cuss what we do.
And how do we handle it when things they promise to do to get themselves elected never get done? This is not a dig at the current government (although they have proved themselves masters of incompetence) but at all parties... That being a given, do we still call it a democracy?Well, in a socialist society perhaps! Where the state knows best and its citizens are kept under control. But, you live in a democracy and what you’re suggesting is just wrong. We are back to your I think it, so it must be.
Here is how it works very simplified, So, perspective candidates / parties propose the ideas, changes and what they intend to do whilst in government. The citizens vote to decide what they want doing in their name. The elected government now has a mandate to carry out ONLY what they got elected to do. Clearly they have to react to other situation that arise, but nothing else. We vote every 5 years on a government, in theory enough time for the existing government to implement the mandate they were elected for after which we vote again.
It only generates revenue when people break the law. It always amazes me how people see speed cameras as a tax or revenue generator. Don’t break the law, don’t get taxed…At one camera site in particular there were few accidents ......... until the camera was installed. It's a revenue camera, not a speed or safety camera
No, we should inform and educate the citizens on all aspects of what the policies will entail. We should then allow them to vote on the parties manifestos that state what and how they may tackle the issue. What one man thinks is the right thing t9 do is another’s worst nightmare.Even if that's the case, maybe sometimes we should do things just because we know they're the right things to do...
No they don't. They vote for representatives not delegates.....The citizens vote to decide what they want doing in their name. ....
You’re absolutely right, the route problem I believe is that 99% of the population don’t read the manifestos before voting. They vote either on ‘traditional’ lines, or in sound bite presentations of leaders ‘personalities’. Id like to suggest you ask you family and friends how many read all the parties manifestos before voting at the last election. If you don’t know what they were and they voted for them they can’t now very well complain.And how do we handle it when things they promise to do to get themselves elected never get done? This is not a dig at the current government (although they have proved themselves masters of incompetence) but at all parties... That being a given, do we still call it a democracy?
Stop making stuff up, and actually read posts before replying. I’ve never mentioned delegates, everything I stated is how you vote for representatives, ie with a mandate to represent the citizens will.No they don't. They vote for representatives not delegates.
Basic O level stuff - you need to do some homework on the subject of the British Constitution.
That’s why they haven’t mandated for vehicles speed to be linked to and limited by satnav which could ensure nobody speeds. With your background you know how easy that would be to actually achieve. No need for speed cameras, and a lucrative tax disappears!It only generates revenue when people break the law. It always amazes me how people see speed cameras as a tax or revenue generator. Don’t break the law, don’t get taxed…
I can't be bothered to search for it just to prove a point. You'll only say it was in a right wing newspaper ergo a lie, anyway. It was well publicised at the time.I don't believe it. Do you have any evidence?
Every speed camera in UK has been accused of increasing accidents its just another of those silly ideas kicked around by the unwoke.
https://www.rospa.com/media/documents/road-safety/speed-cameras-factsheet.pdf
It's coming soon, along with automatic braking.That’s why they haven’t mandated for vehicles speed to be linked to and limited by satnav which could ensure nobody speeds. With your background you know how easy that would be to actually achieve. No need for speed cameras, and a lucrative tax disappears!
Enter your email address to join: