Krome10
Established Member
The questions aren't digs btw, more food for thought and opening of the discussion...
Yes, but subconsciously if met with that brand and a brand you've not heard of unless you actively think to ignore it, job done.Maybe but not always for the right reasons. That stupid advert for Xero tells me that the product is not good enough to sell on it's own merit and that it is marketed by some right clowns whom you would not trust with your money. A good product will often sell itself and also from people recomending it to others, having to resort to expensive Tv advertising to shove it in peoples faces for me just screams out " avoid at all cost "
Apparently since DEI has been largely ignored by U.S. universities the number of Asian students has increased, the number of blacks has decreased. Not the original plan.Maybe if you both lend your marketing strategy input to them, Xero could be worth even more that the billions they're currently worth? Perhaps they're hiring?
As for the race sensitive folk above, what would you consider a good white to people of colour ratio to be? Should it reflect the company's country of origin or the UK regardless? Should it reflect the brand? If it's a football related product, should it reflect the country's non-white population or the ratio of white to people of colour footballers? Are there other demographics that are poorly represented? Who should decide what the correct ratios are and should they be enforceable by law?
Rather like very expensively signwritten vans and trucks which don't give anyone the foggiest idea of what the company actually does.That's one that really does annoy me.. "It's Xero with an X..." Most companies that spent more than 5 minutes and 50p determining their branding stategy would have determined if you need to tell people how to spell your name so they can find you online you are already on to a loser.
Old advert for an early Fiesta - horsepower, number of gears, showed it easily overtaking a lorry and how much stuff you could get in it.which adverts used to be more successful at extolling the virtues of a product and or their practical uses?
You make a fair point and certainly a diversity of skin colour across advertising should have happened years ago. But now because many companies are jumping on the "woke" BLM, virtue signalling bandwagon we now see a distortion in the balance and then that has a negative effect on what they are trying to achieve. It's in the same category as white policemen being ignored for promotion simply because they are white.As for the race sensitive folk above, what would you consider a good white to people of colour ratio to be? Should it reflect the company's country of origin or the UK regardless? Should it reflect the brand? If it's a football related product, should it reflect the country's non-white population or the ratio of white to people of colour footballers? Are there other demographics that are poorly represented? Who should decide what the correct ratios are and should they be enforceable by law?
Not only that, in the US many companies are abandoning DEI. Commonsense reigns.Apparently since DEI has been largely ignored by U.S. universities the number of Asian students has increased, the number of blacks has decreased. Not the original plan.
In W.Cornwall we have NHS literature sent out with details of where to go for help in sixteen languages - Farsi, Tagalog etc. - the speakers of Cornish probably outnumber the speakers we have here of some of these languages (not that I am suggesting the details should be given in Cornish, that would be virtue signalling in the extreme).
Henry Ford - We know half of the money spent on advertising is wasted, but we don't know which half.
We should have maybe two coppers out of a hundred from racial minorities, London should have maybe 55 out of a hundred. Which part is Britain?
Old advert for an early Fiesta - horsepower, number of gears, showed it easily overtaking a lorry and how much stuff you could get in it.
New advert for a car of some sort: diverse group of youngsters driving about a disused factory site, throwing powder paint out the windows.
Old advert for DIY shop - look what we have, good quality, knowledgable staff.
New “” - “Are you suffering from ‘house-barrassment’?” Whoever thought that up should hang their head in shame.
I found the fiesta advert, I think! I don't watch enough TV to know how it compares to car adverts now, but suspect you're right that they'll not have car details like this has.
Must say though, a bit woke back then to show a woman driver when the majority of drivers were men. So perhaps some things still haven't changed Mind you, maybe they counterbalanced that with the kitchen sink!
Oh I haven’t seen that one. No idea what it refers too. Obviously something you are watching is feeding that add.Youtube is obsessed with advertising 3rd quarter planing and that Adam is a tired 1/4 back at the moment, makes so many good videos unwatchable.
You may be but I'm not. In addition you are telling the broadcasters that there are people who are wiling to payI’m very happy to pay the nominal amount they charge to avoid ads when streaming from their sites.
Seems logical to me. If you haven't seen the name you would presume it started with a ZThat's one that really does annoy me.. "It's Xero with an X..." Most companies that spent more than 5 minutes and 50p determining their branding stategy would have determined if you need to tell people how to spell your name so they can find you online you are already on to a loser.
Give us a clue Phil. What's DEI?Apparently since DEI has been largely ignored by U.S. universities the number of Asian students has increased, the number of blacks has decreased. Not the original plan.
No worries here. Tells them it's a good thing.In addition you are telling the broadcasters that there are people who are wiling to pay
DEI? Google is your friend. Diversity, equity and inclusion.You may be but I'm not. In addition you are telling the broadcasters that there are people who are wiling to pay
Seems logical to me. If you haven't seen the name you would presume it started with a Z
Give us a clue Phil. What's DEI?
Best advert for a long time is the hang gliding goats. Really well produced. I had to take note that it was for Virgin so that it would stick in my memory. Mostly I remember names for those companies or products that I avoid at all costs, so for those who say there is no such thing as bad advertising, there is in my case.
I'm more interested in, is the product "good"I'll restate how much I detest some adverts... But I must add that basing a decision on whether to use a company on how annoying their advert is seems buttocks about face.
Surely their human rights record, political bed sharing, sustainability, monopolising practices, tax avoidance, etc etc should be better determinants?
Enter your email address to join: