Ian, I was really surprised when that ball turned out to be a ball! The only difference between turning a ball without a box is that you have to hold the box bit when you finish the ball.
So I did it again and loe and behold it turned out VERY similar.
It has got to be that when you use the way I learned to turn a ball that it has to end up a ball? Otherwise how could I have finished up with not only those 2 but 37 of the blasted things in my lazy Susan?
I ain't anything special when it comes to turning and the next time a lump of wood comes past me will not either be the first or the last me-thinks? That's why I stand slightly to one side of the spinny bit :mrgreen:
I have been turning for a hobby for about 24 years now and when I stop learning what I am doing I will stop turning. Mind you, they will probably be nailing the lid of my box :shock: That, I hope is a long way off!
If I remember correctly this is the method I used
https://www.woodworkersinstitute.com/wo ... be/?p=1367.
Only I took the 'top' off the 'bottle he had in the cube. It isn't as difficult as it looks, BUT it is quite impressive. It can't be that difficult! I managed it!! :?
I almost forgot to d=say that I didn't folloe the guide completely and I didn see the point of sanding the raw cube. Why, as it's going to be turned to a different profile and sanded later. In fact I found that getting the dammed cube cubic was one of the most difficult bits!
Give it a try, you may be very plesently surprised and 'if' it fails then it's a bit more practice and only a likkle bit of wood. Unlike cash it does grow on trees :mrgreen: