The Lie Nielsen Face Joinery Float - Reviewed

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Derek Cohen (Perth Oz)

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2005
Messages
3,392
Reaction score
1,891
Location
Perth, Australia
The Lie Nielsen Face Joinery Float - Reviewed


Very recently Lie Nielsen released a set of joinery floats that were fashioned after the planemaker’s floats they were producing in association with Clark & Williams. These floats are intended to aid in the fine-tuning of joints used in cabinetmaking. There are three floats in all, two for mortices and one for tenons. The float under review is the Face Float for tuning tenons.

LNFloat17.jpg


LNFloat16.jpg



Construction and Dimensions

The face float is available in a push or pull version. I purchased the push version because I found this to be the more natural action.

According to the LN website, these are made from S-7 tool steel, hardened and tempered to RC 50-52 for edge life and resharpening ability. 8tpi, 80° rake angle, maple handles. It is 1” wide and 3 3/8” long.

Preparation

While the floats come sharpened and may be used straight out of the box, it is recommended that the teeth be first filed. I will reinforce this recommendation as I did initially use the float without filing the teeth, and was disappointed in the performance.

To illustrate the difference, I did a test with half the teeth filed and the other half original. Here is the result:

LNFloat12.jpg




Top unfiled, bottom filed.


Filing the teeth

LN suggests a 6 inch double extra slim taper file for sharpening. I did not have one to hand, so first tried with a 4 inch double slim taper Groblet, a file I use for sharpening a 15 tpi dovetail saw. This proved to work exceedingly slowly, and so I turned to a 6” extra slim Nicholson file. This ended up being a good choice.

Finally I found a use for my Zyliss vise! It made a good support for filing the float.

From the LN website ….


Initial sharpening: The black oxide coating of the floats is an aid in the initial sharpening. Simply file away the black coating to shiny metal for the first sharpening. Use care to apply a slight even pressure on the file to maintain the cutting geometry. On wider sections you may notice some very slight distortion showing as slightly low spots on the faces of the teeth. This is normal and is the result of volumetric changes and stresses of heat treating. It’s not necessary to remove the hollow, establishing a good cutting edge on the teeth is the goal.

The full instructions may be found on the LN website.

Below I am supporting the file flat on the face and against the gullet.

LNFloat14.jpg



Here is the half-original, half-sharpened result. Note the hollows in some of the faces.

LNFloat13.jpg



The LN face float is well made. Perhaps the only criticism is the need to sharpen it before it can be used. On the other hand, this will need to be done at some time anyway - not as often as a plane blade, but more much frequently than a handsaw. The initial filing was a relatively straight forward affair, and time will tell whether this is a task that remains so.


Cutting and Tuning Tenons

I generally cut tenons with either a backsaw or a bandsaw. For this assessment, I prepared a few in both Jarrah (representing hardwood) and construction Pine (representing softwood).

LNFloat11.jpg



The plan is to compare tuning tenon faces using the joinery float, a rasp and a block plane.


The Joinery Float

The float is capable of removing a lot of waste very rapidly when used on hardwood. Before I sharpened the teeth, it had a feel more of a file, producing more dust than shavings. Once sharpened, the teeth could be felt biting into the wood.

LNFloat7.jpg



I liked the control that the float gave. It was stable in use and left a flat, smooth finish to the tenon face.

Using the float on Pine was a less satisfactory story. Cutting across the grain now produced fine shavings and sawdust.

LNFloat6.jpg



The Rasp

I used an Auriou AU-8-250-6, which is close in grain size to a Nicholson #49. In other words, it is quite a coarse rasp.

The Auriou cut fast, leaving a marked but acceptable smooth face.

LNFloat9.jpg



I like the rasp for use here, but I warn that use of one must be done with care. Its length makes it easy to tilt, and then it will create an off square face.

LNFloat8.jpg



The performance of the rasp on soft Pine was very similar to that on hardwood.

LNFloat5.jpg



The Block Plane

The handplane of choice for tuning tenon faces is the Stanley or LN #140, a skew block plane.

Here is my Stanley #140.

LNFloat3.jpg


LNFloat4.jpg



The #140 works equally well on hard- and softwood. It can remove a larger amount of waste quickly, which is, I believe, its advantage over the other tools here. It also produces the smoothest surface finish. However, like the rasp, care must be taken to keep the plane square.

Conclusions

When cutting tenons, I try to cut as close to the line as possible. Consequently, any tuning that needs to be done is usually a whisker here-or-there. A skew block plane gets the job done, but is sometimes like using a hammer to swat a fly. This is where the face float comes into its own. I liked the control it presented when removing waste. It could remove a little or a lot. The rasp is a possible alternative to the float, but it must be used with care. The bottom line is that a face float is a desirable tool for tuning tenons.




Derek Cohen
Perth, Australia
August 2007
 
Derek

Many thanks for your informative review. I have to confess to never having seen a float in real life, let alone used one. I guess the closest to it I've had would be a large "Dreadnought" file. So a few questions, please. Is this float intended for use only across the grain? Does it chatter? Have you formed a view about how well the teeth will hold their edge? Having to buy a special file just to get started sounds a tad tedious. Thanks.

Regards.
 
Hey Derek--thanks!

How did I know the likely results of the review? Oh, that's because I've used floats :lol:

Just for general info, floats are made from steel soft enough to file--they are about the same hardness as a western hand saw. Being more mass, though, they file "smoother" than a saw blade.

The edges will retain their sharpness for quite some time used cross grain like this. At least if stored properly (nothing touching or banging into them).

Every X sharpenings, it is wise to lightly joint them. That means lightly using a flat file to even out the tips of the teeth (just like on a hand saw). Begin at the hendle end and with just enough pressure to keep the file on the float's teeth, move it towards the end. Make sure to do the entire surface lightly. Then file the float's teeth until the slight flats from jointing are removed. I would say touching them up with a file in this way can take only a couple minutes.

As a tip, if anyone purchase these floats from LN direct or from Mike Hancock in the UK (or whoever), simply order a single saw file (or a 3-square which is what I use on them) at the same time. If a float is all the file is used on, in all likelihood the file will last the rest of your life.

Take care, Mike
 
Derek

Thanks for the review - how do these compare with a Japanese saw rasp?

I often use one to tidy and round-off tenons as my Woodrat produces rounded mortices. Much quicker than squaring out the holes with a chisel.
May not be traditional though!

Rod
 
Is this float intended for use only across the grain? Does it chatter? Have you formed a view about how well the teeth will hold their edge? Having to buy a special file just to get started sounds a tad tedious.

This float (and its two siblings), as mentioned in the review, are designed specifically for joinery. In this specific case, for use on a tenon face, which means for planing across the grain. I did not attempt to use them any other way.

Does it chatter? No .. while it did not run as smoothly as the rasp, this is more likely a reflection of my inexperience with such a tool. The fact is that floats have been used for years in this situation by a few - and the thought did occur to me a short while after Clark & Williams began making production floats - but this is the first time (I am aware of) that floats have been sold for this specific task. So it is not surprising that few of us (Mike excepted) have any experience in this area.

This float serves as just one of several techniques one may employ to do the task of tuning a tenon face. I was curious to find out how it compared. My instinct said that it was a good idea. But there are many ways to skin a cat and pockets are not bottomless. One has to decide how important it is to get a dedicated tool like this. At this time I do not see many other areas for using it.

Regards from Perth

Derek
 
Thanks for the review Derek. I was considering getting this one, though I confess to owning several of the plane floats already. Another possible use for floats is a tear-out-free finish on gnarly woods, and glass smooth finish on end grain. Though I would chamfer the ends first.
 
$60 for a file that doesn't come ready sharpened for use and requires you to buy another tool just to sharpen it :shock: I will stick to my Japanese saw rasp, double sided (course/fine) very hard teeth so no sharpening and as cheap as chips. Another one for the collectors.

John
 
I just love it when follow-ups to a review turn to denigrating talk ("Another one for the collectors. ") or something as base as cost.

Floats for plane making and for joinery have been around--in England--for centuries and were considered standard practice for adjusting tenons and mortises by many English (and US) authors.

An advantage to something like a float, just like western saws, is they are resharpenable, not use and toss types of tools.

One can make their own floats. It's not hard. Pennies for a worn out file at a boot sale, an oven, a newish saw file, a bucket of cooking oil and a mapp torch. And about an hour or two's time. Maybe a bit more if one tries to make a posh one with a decent handle.

Trying to use a Shinwa or other branded Japanese rasp for tenons...I don't think would work very well. That should be the comparison, not something made for shaping wood-widgets.

Take care, Mike "Cranky" Wenzloff
 
Hi Mike, the comment about collectors was an attempt at humour and someone has to say it now Jacob has been banned. :D I can see how the tool could be useful and am aware of their history. It is just that at 60 bucks for a blunt file I am amazed that anyone buys one. I can see where the money goes on a LN plane and even own one but think that tools like these are priced on who is selling them rather than on their value. But each to their own.

Anyway, shouldn't you be making saws not wasting your time on here? (another joke)

John
 
MikeW":3e3mauy2 said:
...Trying to use a Shinwa or other branded Japanese rasp for tenons...I don't think would work very well...

While this is something I haven't had the need to try due to using other tools for tenon work, I don't see why a shinto rasp wouldn't do a fine job of it. I routinely use one for other tasks, and find it works fine for taking off bits of wood. It's very stiff, doesn't deform.

Pam
 
Do not get me wrong - I was not knocking the Joinery Float.

Last year I made Popular Mechanic's Porch Glider in English Oak which has dozens of mortise & tenon joints of various sizes. I used a Japanese saw rasp with great effect. :)

e8129f5d.jpg



Rod
 
derek, as usual an interesting and informative review.

however i am intregued that you found the length of the rasp a problem.

as an second year engineering apprentice, one of my tasks was to show others how to file straight and square. common misconception is to use a short file to keep things square, whereas in fact a longer one with practice makes it much easier.

i would have thought that as a man who uses and makes looooooooong planes, you would actually have figured that once you get used to it, a longer tool will always offer greater flat and square accuracy, since it is easier to see if the front or rear tilt. i guess the difference is that when using a plane, you have more wood to rest on whereas with a tenon, the supporting area is quite narrow.

personally i would see that as another area to use the zyliss vice above the bench cause then it is easier to lock your elbow, and get the file/rasp working in the horizontal position.

what is nice to know is what actually a float is for which until today i did not really know.

paul :wink:
 
Johnboy":1c9rtc0f said:
Hi Mike, the comment about collectors was an attempt at humour and someone has to say it now Jacob has been banned. :D I can see how the tool could be useful and am aware of their history. It is just that at 60 bucks for a blunt file I am amazed that anyone buys one. I can see where the money goes on a LN plane and even own one but think that tools like these are priced on who is selling them rather than on their value. But each to their own.

Anyway, shouldn't you be making saws not wasting your time on here? (another joke)

John
Sorry for the manner in which I made comments, John.

There are economics involved in making any widget. Do I think they could sharpen them? Sure. But they have chosen not to. Whether they sell enough of them as is will determine whether they sharpen future ones or stop making them altogether. That it costs X amount to make these doesn't surprise me they are priced where they are, though. Try making one. Extrapolate that out to making, carrying inventory, insurance, machinery, wages, etc. I think they are in that sense reasonably priced.

And yes, joking or not I should not take the time to visit forums and post.

Take care, Mike
 
Hi Mike, I understand what you say about the overheads etc but LN sell many other products to share that burden. I presume they are CNC milled and heat treated, possibly contracted out? I will have to get my son to quote me for a batch of 50 (he is a toolmaker) and see if I can go into competition. My point is that they are very simple to make with no new investment in machinery required. As to sales volumes surely if they were cheaper then they would sell more? I suppose that would dilute the brand then though. I have no problem with TLN charging as much as he can get, just surprised that so many people are willing to pay the premium for such simple tools.

Don't work too hard.

John

Ps. no need to apologise, no offense taken.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top