CHJ
Established Member
Tony":2tv3khvy said:Would you like to fly on a jet plane that had mixed measurement systems used in it's design????
Sorry to say Tony but thousands of people do every day, USA Aircraft are in the main Imperial (they just accommodate metric standard manufactured materials such as skin sheets by selecting a zone tolerance that covers the difference) there are very few Aircraft that do not have major systems sourced from both imperial and metric manufactures.
USA Aircraft with RR engines, and French APU's (auxiliary power Units) are a very common combination. You will find many hydraulic hoses etc. with imperial one end and metric the other, and metric gearboxes with an imperial adaptor for an alternator etc.
I worked in a research Aircraft drawing office for several years during the period of metrication (mostly at the same time as attempts to introduce CAD working) and we were constantly having to mix and match standards between the two.
Granted on a prime level of sorting out the basic aerodynamics, loadings etc. each fundamental design group stick with one standard but I can assure you that a subcontractor from another theater of measurement often use their own and just port the figures to the appropriate standard if required.
I am with you on the need to be vigilant and wherever possible stick to one standard, but in the real world of global supply and competition it is difficult to be dogmatic.
And like most people of my age group mix and match to suit my own perceptions of size. Both my children 30-40's now work in metric and can not visualize imperial.