woodbrains":2v4gunbh said:
It's not a lot to do with how you market it, it is almost entirely to do with it! ... Anyone have any clues?
I hesitate to give advice, as I said before I haven't once hit my financial targets across a full year as a custom furniture maker. All I can do is share those things that have worked reasonably well.
I've found a way of exhibiting at a few big county shows for virtually no outlay. One in particular runs a competition sponsored by the Forestry Commision and that gets my work in front of over 100,000 people. Every year that reliably brings in a few commissions and those commissions often lead to other enquiries. It's not however a self fuelling virtuous circle, if I stopped doing it I'm pretty sure the work would dry up within a couple of years.
One thing I always try and do is get additional sales on the back of any commission. Someone orders a hall table, great I'll sell them a mirror to go with it. Someone orders a desk, do they want a chair in a matching timber. Over the course of a year that adds up.
I know you trained under Krenov at the College of the Redwoods. You can grab a
small advantage from that. It's not a silver bullet solution but neither is it nothing. I've got a similarly prestigious training background and I milk it for everything it's worth. Don't expect clients to open their cheque books at the first mention of Krenov's name, but there are some occasions when it will definitely tip the balance. Despite the virtual death of the studio furniture market a lot of clients have a secret (or not so secret) hope that they're still buying the Chippendales of tomorrow. Signing your work and making sure they know your training credentials certainly doesn't hurt, a "cabinet on stand" from someone who trained at the feet of the master is more valuable than a "cabinet on stand" from any old Joe Sawdust.
A couple of years ago a local pier was refurbished and I bought up a load of the salvaged Greenheart, turned it into garden furniture and sold it via a local garden centre. That was a bit of a bonanza, and it made me appreciate the value of trumpeting local or notable timber. I know a couple of makers who did a similar thing when Nelson's Victory was restored a few years back. They incorporated salvaged scraps into furniture, and given the yachting heritage where I live, they made out like bandits for a couple of years. It's clear to me that unique timbers gives the small maker an edge over the high street. By making fairly standard Shaker style pieces in spectacular Curly Cherry or Fiddleback Maple, or fairly standard Arts & Crafts pieces in Tiger Oak or Brown Oak I can get a hefty premium and avoid being crushed by price comparisons. It's a lot of work to track down truly exceptional boards, but IMO it's worth it. Most of my clients don't want purely functional furniture, they commission because they want something that's a feature. Achieving that impact via design alone is risky unless you're exceptionally talented, the fact is original design runs you straight into the "Marmite" problem. And if you
are that talented then you'd be better off sticking to the drawing board and leaving the making to someone else. But producing fairly standard pieces in jaw droopingly spectacular timbers gets you to the same end point with considerably less risk.
Then there's the issue that you'll almost inevitably end up combining furniture making with something else, and choosing the right "something else" is probably the biggest factor that determines success or failure. Pretty much every maker that I know who has kept going for more than a few years does it by blending furniture with a more lucrative side line. And the exceptions only manage it because they have a supportive partner in a well paid job, took very early retirement on a decent pension, packed in a fat job in the city after trousering a packet, or some similar reason that exempts them from the financial laws of physics. I've tried a few side lines that have worked for me, but they're mainly viable because of my location, yacht fit outs and "equestrian furniture" (sounds whacky I know but you'd be surprised at how many trophy stables get built and create a demand for high end saddle racks, mounting blocks, bridle racks, etc). The work that I see other makers doing almost always slots into a short list of areas, heritage joinery, joinery packages, teaching, or kitchens and fitted work. That or they stumble across some highly specialised side line, it could be anything from humidors to wooden presses for bookbinding. Just something that turns a profit in the fallow periods between commissions. The problem is these side lines can crowd out the furniture making that got you into the craft in the first place. That's the issue I face, if I was more commercially orientated I'd be winding down the furniture making to almost nothing and concentrating on yacht interior work, it just pays so much better and so much more reliably.
Hope there's something there that's useful. As I said before, I haven't once hit my targets across a full trading year, so I'm no advertisement for guaranteed riches as a furniture maker, but if you're determined to make the leap then maybe there's something from my experiences that you can profit from.
Good luck!