Interesting article in the Grauniad today.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...wall-plates-were-smashed-furniture-was-ripped
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...wall-plates-were-smashed-furniture-was-ripped
It's been illegal to release them for decades, the date stated in the article (2019) is referring to the act which replaced/supplemented the exisitng one. I was a groundsman 17 years ago and we had to capture and kill the blighters due to the destruction they were causing, it's no joke how bad they are and frankly I'd like to see more efforts into controlling their population. With all due credit to the article the chaos they cause to the woodland and urban environments is unbelievable. I see no problem with eating them, current law states they must be killed "humanely" but there is also no legal requirement to check the traps - so you... - so you can just starve them to death, ....It's been illegal to release them for decades, the date stated in the article (2019) is referring to the act which replaced/supplemented the exisitng one. I was a groundsman 17 years ago and we had to capture and kill the blighters due to the destruction they were causing, it's no joke how bad they are and frankly I'd like to see more efforts into controlling their population. With all due credit to the article the chaos they cause to the woodland and urban environments is unbelievable. I see no problem with eating them, current law states they must be killed "humanely" but there is also no legal requirement to check the traps - so you can just starve them to death, much better than drowning or smacking them with a shovel(!)
Animal cruelty, what a piece of work you are.
@graham88@GeoffW I feel there's been a miscommunication here. I'd never condone starving something to death, usually including an exclaimation mark in brackets indicates sarcasm. I was simply stating that the law allows you to make a long drawn out death perfectly fine whereas something much simpler and faster, the shovel, is considered inhumane, any traps should of course be checked regularly because you wont always catch the intended animal. Sorry for any confusion caused.
They are not native, introduced by I believe the duke of Bedford, presumably because they were thought to be cute. They are enormously destructive. They have largely overtaken the native red across most of the country. The major problem is that here they have relatively few natural predators, we have killed off most of them, Martens etc. So should we not take steps to redress the situation caused by our own stupidity? Ask anyone from Australia about introduced species and the problems they cause, Cane Toads, Rabbits and yes cats, which have gone feral and destroy native species in huge numbers potentially threatening them with extinction in some cases. I would not advocate eliminating them entirely, I doubt it could be done anyway, but their numbers certainly ought to be controlled. We really need to learn to stop messing with things for the sake of our own convenience/pleasure, out contribution to global warming being the most extreme example.Little furry animals just trying to get on with life.
Are we to kill cats, because they decimate the bird population, or dogs because they can attack and kill humans, or for that matter we should eradicate lions and tigers because they often do the same.
Squirrels haven't killed anyone, nor are responsible for the destruction of other small rodents or animals.
But it is perceived that they are an invasive species. But everything that grey squirrels are accused of is exactly the same for red squirrels
Yet red squirrels are favoured over the two.
Invasive species is the keyword here, and the Grey is an invasive species. and we really should be doing all we can to eradicate all invasive species.Little furry animals just trying to get on with life.
Are we to kill cats, because they decimate the bird population, or dogs because they can attack and kill humans, or for that matter we should eradicate lions and tigers because they often do the same.
Squirrels haven't killed anyone, nor are responsible for the destruction of other small rodents or animals.
But it is perceived that they are an invasive species. But everything that grey squirrels are accused of is exactly the same for red squirrels
Yet red squirrels are favoured over the two.
they are not destructive, quite the opposite, they help to create diversity, they are a benefit to our wild places.Can we start a thread on the introduction of Beavers and their destructive nature?
Enter your email address to join: