I've been using a medium ceramic stone for several years, but I've always lubricated it in use. I use water, lately with a drop of washing-up liquid in it to break the surface tension and help it spread more easily - you need less water if you do that, I've found, but you do have to 'top-up' the water on the stone from time to time as it either sinks in, evaporates or gets pushed off by the item being honed. I've had no problems with it glazing or clogging, and suspect that may be more likely if the stone is used dry. The stone is fast-cutting, leaves an edge suitable for such things as roughing-out planes, chopping chisels and the like without further polishing, and it's compact. You have to leave stone and case to dry out after use, but it can be stored quite easily in the tool-chest once it's dry, and doesn't take up much space. The only disadvantage I've found is that it isn't perfectly flat - one side is 'good enough', the other is decidedly concave in length. (Dressing on a diamond lap would cure that - but I don't have one.)
A couple of months ago, I invested in an ultra-fine polishing stone, one side of which is flat, though the other definitely isn't. However, I have noticed that it discolours in service, despite being lubricated in the same way as with the medium stone. Doesn't seem to have affected the performance yet, though a month or two may not be long enough for problems to develop. Might have to obtain a diamond scarifying stone...