on Curves
While most amateurs focus on square work, you also have to consider the utilitarian purpose of what they made. When I needed a file caninet, of course it’s got square lines. Ever see a round filing cabinet?
stickly was influenced by scandavian lines and shaker lines. His initial work was very square. It was not until he hired Ellis before we saw more curves.
if you look at the work by Krenov, you see a unique style but one that is stil square even if it has the occasional coopered door.
the work done by chippendale et alhad square chest of drawers albeit some curves in the base skirts.
Details change the looks. The **** beading, the base molding, the crown molding. The same box can morph into a variety of styles.
I have included curves into a lot of my furniture. Sometimes it is quite subtle to soften what appears to be a straight line. I recall posting a piece on this forum for discussion, and bemoaning how much longer it took to make. Custard (Gary?), a local professional in the UK, and whose work I admire, commented that any curve creates three times the effort and time needed compared with square work.
We do not see much work in this vein, and I think that a big factor is that there are so many complications when one moves off-square. This is a chest of drawers I built for my wife. Working weekends only, it took 18 months. The case is a tapered curve on the sides and is bow-fronted. The drawers were made to fit the angles, and as a result, all the half-blind dovetails are made at compound angles (splay to the drawer side along with a splay to the curved drawer fronts). For reference, the drawer fronts are figured Jarrah, and the drawer sides quartersawn Tasmanian Oak, both Australian. The case is Makore (from West Africa).
This was published by FWW magazine ..
As David said, there are amateurs making furniture like this as few pros can do so economically. I do not reject the use of machine connectors, such as biscuit joiners or Dominos (I own both). However, my view is that they make the entry to furniture making so easy, that so many are unlikely to go past this stage and learn traditional joinery. And THAT condemns all the furniture made to landfill eventually (all joinery here was either mortice&tenon, sliding dovetails or dovetails).
The earlier comments about changing kitchens every 10 years, sometimes less, is all about the perception of value. I know David has made a kitchen for home, and I'm sure others here have as well. I built ours several years ago, updating and replacing one made commercially some 25 years earlier. It was not a decision made lightly. The old kitchen was quite serviceable and actually very nice looking (in Tasmanian Oak). But 25 years before we liked raised panels, and then 25 years later we did not. Still, the reason it was replaced was because I could do all of the work (as David did, and as others here have done). Costs come into it, but the perception of value-added was emphasised by the use of solid wood (in my case, USA Curly Maple). I love the outcome and it still brings a glow of pride. We will be selling the house in a few years when I retire, and no doubt someone will pull it out and replace it with veneer or paint.
Bar stools made to match
Amateurs rule!
Regards from Perth
Derek