I'vce been rather interested in this and posted a thread a few months ago asking if the startlingly different practise in the US was foolish, or if the EU was over-cautious.
Lots of people will tell you they are right - as is the way with contentious things generally. However, the numbers do tell a story.
The best data I can find for the US is actually very good. It's summarised here:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/741 ... -injuries/
which, in turn is sourced from here:
https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/NEISSQuery/ ... D5xg%3d%3d
So, about 4,700 tablesaw amputations/year in a population of 330M. Rate per 10M population = 142
The UK's data is less well structured. However the HSE publishes *all* amputations (not just saws) in the RIDNAT dataset here:
https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/index.htm
I've assumed table saw amputations are non fatal, so the upper limit ('cos some are legs and toes) is the total number - 573 in 2018/19 - in a population of 67M. Rate per 10M population = 86
Now, perhaps US folk have wider ownership of table saws, or use them more often, or are more diligent about reporting stats, but the stats show at least a 65% higher rate of table saw amputation in the US than total amputations in the UK.
Two final points:
1. Stats are, by their nature, an accumulation of individual anecdote. It's unlikely to be you, but it shall be someone. And it might be you...
2. Given that it might be you, and the effort required to materially mitigate the risk is quite small... fix the knife.