J-G
Established Member
I said at the start that much more information would be needed before anyone could undertake manufacture and this morning (having little or no commitments) I decided to draw the Gear, taking scale measurements from the photo's posted.
Naturally I have made some assumptions which may be wrong but only the OP can correct those by direct measurement of the failed gear.
I have no idea where the 'Ridgeway' was made so am not hide bound by partial knowledge but by enlarging one of the photo's, I was able to measure the thread at over 10 times true size so imagine my surprise when the 'calculated' pitch came out to be exactly 24tpi. Since there are only 3 'standard' threads 3/8" Dia. & 24 tpi -- Admiralty, UNF & Spark -- more work is needed to correctly determine whether it should be Whit. or Unified form - though, in reality, it may not matter a great deal as the mating screw could be replaced with even a metric equivalent.
As the photo's only show the damaged gear - rather than the gear plus the broken away 'boss' - I cannot determine whether the tapered hole really is a 'hole' or a 'slot'. I've drawn it as a hole but it could just as easily be a slot, in which case dimension F is irrelevant.
Naturally I have made some assumptions which may be wrong but only the OP can correct those by direct measurement of the failed gear.
I have no idea where the 'Ridgeway' was made so am not hide bound by partial knowledge but by enlarging one of the photo's, I was able to measure the thread at over 10 times true size so imagine my surprise when the 'calculated' pitch came out to be exactly 24tpi. Since there are only 3 'standard' threads 3/8" Dia. & 24 tpi -- Admiralty, UNF & Spark -- more work is needed to correctly determine whether it should be Whit. or Unified form - though, in reality, it may not matter a great deal as the mating screw could be replaced with even a metric equivalent.
As the photo's only show the damaged gear - rather than the gear plus the broken away 'boss' - I cannot determine whether the tapered hole really is a 'hole' or a 'slot'. I've drawn it as a hole but it could just as easily be a slot, in which case dimension F is irrelevant.