Reasons for the relative costs of oak?

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
frugal":35hpzfkf said:
In this case your client has paid for 100% more wood than he needs, so that wastage is 100%

I'm sorry, but if you are buying twice as much as you need, then the wastage is 50%.

Tony and Chris were talking about wastage, not overbuying.
 
How to entertain yourself on a winter's evening - start a new thread about the price of oak and stand well back!

Steve, don't listen to the others, :wink: your words on pricing sound very familar and sensible to me

Dan Tovey wrote:
Ultimately though, timber cost is normally no more than 10-15% of the selling price of a project, so it's easy to become over obsessive.

Dan, it depends what you're making. If it's a piece of fine furniture or even a window or door in ordinary timber 15% sounds about right but the timber cost on this job was originally supposed to be 39% of the selling price and has ended up being 48%. On a job with large timber content and relatively low labour content its bound to be higher. With oak it's dangerous not to be obsessive. I was a bit obsessive and I still lost out.:cry:

I don't throw away timber unless it's too thin or too short to be of use. I do throw away waney edge sapwood and split heartwood and end shakes. Out of each board I could use less than 50% to fulfill my cutting list the rest was firewood or offcuts of no immediate use. These will eventually be used or given away but no means of being paid for them in the short term, if at all, so must be allowed for in the customers price.



I should have stated that I was talking here about European oak, I haven't used AWO for some years - it comes too dry and the grain is dull compared to Euro and English.

I usually use kilned European sq edged oak but for my current job (4prs garage doors) I have decided (with the help of this forum last week) to used air-dried because of the exposure to the elements they will get.

I told my supplier what I wanted the oak for, they even had some that was aired-dried and then part-kilned down to 15% for just such uses.
I'm so used to ordering and receiving sq edge oak that I never thought to ask whether this stuff was sq edge and didn't find out it wasn't until it turned up on the lorry :cry:

And no I didn't go along to their yard with my tape and chalk to pick out my own boards because I was buying about 2 tons and also their yard is about 100 miles away. :wink:

The only time I collect timber is when I'm desperate for a couple of boards and I'll get them locally and that happens on average once a year.

So I spent an extra day that I hadn't allowed for ripping out the heart and ripping off the waney edge and cutting off the end shakes. And I had plenty of time while doing this to think about the extra £600 or so that this oak had cost because all this waste was being charged at the same rate as the usable bits. I couldn't have got sq edge air-dried because is was not an option although if I'd known I would have got a quote for
them to cut to my list which I will certainly do next time.

But the reason for my original post was - isn't it an anomally that kiln dried is more valued by most makers because it is ready for use for all internal and semi-external jobs and can be bought sq edged with minimum waste, whereas air dried (only available in waney edge boards) is (presumably) less popular and though only slightly cheaper in unit price works out far more expensive than kilned because of the very
large wastage. :? :?

I now have a large pile of firewood and an equally large pile of small to medium sized offcuts which are really only of use for kitchen doors. It will all get used one day but is not something I had planned on giving workshop space to.

Anyway its been good fun and thanks for your interest and replies. I've done enough thinking about oak for this week, I'm off to get a glass of wine and think about something else

Cheers
Malcolm :)
 
waterhead37":3v12uai9 said:
steve tighe":3v12uai9 said:
First lesson learn't,don't post on here after you've just come in from the pub if you can't explain yourself properly.

You should take your own advice!

If I buy 10 cu ft but can only use 5 cu ft of it, then 50% is unused/wasted.

If plans require 5 cu ft for a job but I buy 10 cu ft because I know some will be unused/wasted - I am buying 100% extra.


wallbash.gif



Waterhead

Timber wastage is the amount of timber left over that you've had to buy to get the job done,if the off-cuts left are the same amount as the timber used,then in joinery that is 100% wastage.


I appreciate the fact that I'm not a hobbyist & I also realise that the way I've bought timber in the past is not going to be the same as others on here,what others have to realise too is that some bods buy/have usually bought timber in cubic metre volumes & not gone down the local timber yard to select their boards,the sheer amount of timber involved would make that impossible to do.

The start of Frugal's post has summed this thread up perfectly in my opinion.

frugal":3v12uai9 said:
It all depends on which end you look at the problem.

What I've posted on this thread is the standard norm in joinery.(Hold on Sgian Dubh,I'll be with you shortly :lol: ),they normally have stocks of the timber in that they tend to use the most,whatever jobs come in then that's where the timber selection comes in,ideally you'd want to make money on the timber as well as the labour,to state the obvious that's what they're in business for,you can't knock them for that,they've laid out the money for the factory & the kit.

Sgian Dubh,I never knew that about AWO,once again standard practice (starting to sound like a bleedin' parrot here now :oops: )had it that european oaks were used where external joinery was concerned.
I also know a couple of bods who ordered a load of AWO machined window sections from a rather large hardwood merchant in Oxfordshire ( no names :roll:), once the merchants had realised what the sections were being used for (more like had the money for the stuff safely banked...and the timber machined) sent these two lads a disclaimer that AWO was not suitable for external use.

They'd paid their money,got their machined timber & got the disclaimer that the stuff was no good for what they were going to use it for,how about that for covering your backside from the timber merchant ?

Personally I wouldn't use AWO for external work,regardless of what any book said about it.Not having a pop mate,I know people have different opinions on things based on personal experiences,that's fine by me.

I've also realised there's no need to get into a
handbags.gif
situation just because your opinions/experiences are different to someone else's on here.

Slainte. :)

p.s. to whichever mod the "report post !" went to,please ignore,like a numpty I hit that button instead of the "quote" one :roll:
 
Apathy is a real problem on this forum, nobody seems to want to get involved in a debate at all... :lol:
 
TheTiddles":1v1trnu6 said:
Apathy is a real problem on this forum, nobody seems to want to get involved in a debate at all... :lol:

grin.gif
grin.gif
grin.gif

Very good,The Tiddles
grin.gif



Things ain't set in stone lads,if that's what you want,then go to a masonry forum.


Different circumstances for different bods,remember that
wink.gif
 

Latest posts

Back
Top