lastminute
Established Member
...correct me if I'm wrong, but negative rake blades are usually fitted to mitre saws...
...is it ok and safe to use one in a table saw?
...is it ok and safe to use one in a table saw?
Steve Maskery":skqpmfrs said:Don't do it.
On a TS the blade is below the workpiece. With a positive rake the tip of the tooth pulls the workpiece down onto the table, but a negative rake mean that the heel of the tooth makes contact fist, pushing the workpiece up off the table and into your face.
So don't do it.
Steve Maskery":1dyxpmt3 said:Hi Andy.
Lets say that you have the blade adjusted properly, so that just the tooth sticks out over the top of the workpiece. That tooth will make contact with the workpiece at just about TDC. The negative rake would mean that the heel makes contact before the tip, sliding underneath the board like a wedge. The board will be lifted and pushed back at you.
You are right about the gullet and sawdust removal, but that is a function of the number of teeth, not the tooth form.
Steve Maskery":2kgdj2li said:I've been thinking about this. You'll be pleased to know that I am right
The way that the saw makes contact with the wood means that the actual cut path is circular, exactly the same diameter as the blade itself. Each tooth cuts a little bit, but because of that radius, each tooth is still presenting itself heel-first, all the way around its cutting arc, no matte where on that arc the tooth is.
So don't do it.
Steve Maskery":13uchlxh said:I must admit that, being a woodworking forum, I did assume that we were talking about using a tablesaw to cut wood.
Eric The Viking":34qlfq13 said:In the absence of any other information, it's _sensible_ to assume it's a woodworking question on a woodwork forum.
And there is a crucial difference between wood and other materials in this context, which has been hinted at, but needs adding to the discussion (IMHO), and that's grain and the related propensity to warp.
If you cut nothing but man-made materials, a negative-rake blade would be less dangerous in a tablesaw (but not risk free entirely). But natural timbers add risk. It's mostly with regard to ripping, and the ability for the workpiece to catch a tooth in the wrong part of its rotational travel - but neg-rake teeth increase the propensity to kickback in this context, as they move the danger point further to the front, and reduce the abillity of the correctly-working teeth to act to hold the workpiece down.
Simply put, with a neg-rake blade in a mitre saw:
- gravity is working with you,
- you cut against a fence,
- kickback mostly throws the workpiece away from you.
With a neg-rake blade in a table saw:
- gravity works against you,
- there is no fence (usually),
- kickback usually comes right at you.
I appreciate that keeping a selection of blades for specific purposes is very sensible, but those elements above don't change, apart from the fact that man-made materials have no grain and thus usually don't distort when cut (although they can).
Arguing from a specific (specialist blades in a high-precision application, used by well-trained staff) to a general case is always risky. And anyway the simple fact that a high-end boatbuilder would keep a selection of specialist blades is tacit acknowledgment of the risks of using the wrong one in the wrong context - even if at best that only means a poor quality cut.
I'm not picking a fight, but it would be wrong for someone to skim-read this and get the impression that it doesn't matter to have a neg-rake blade in a tablesaw.
For most of us, in most circumstances, it's probably less safe than a normal one.
Enter your email address to join: