Terry - Somerset
Established Member
It is easy to measure electricity consumption for induction, traditional ring, kettle etc. If in simplistic terms energy in equals energy out, the differences in consumption must be due to energy losses - that not used to heat the water.
These could arise from simple lid on/off, energy absorbed by the pan or kettle, lost to atmosphere - either directly (small pan on large heating element), radiation from saucepan/kettle etc etc.
Measuring the energy (calorific value?) of gas consumption is probably more difficult. It may not be fair to compare with electric - heating losses may make gas apparently less energy efficient but this ignores the losses on electricity generation in a gas fuelled power station.
In all cases the largest variable may not be the method - more the quantity of water which is only heated as a means to transfer energy to the eggs. Using the optimum size of container with the minimum quantity of water will give the best result.
Alternatively take water out of the equation completely and fry them.
These could arise from simple lid on/off, energy absorbed by the pan or kettle, lost to atmosphere - either directly (small pan on large heating element), radiation from saucepan/kettle etc etc.
Measuring the energy (calorific value?) of gas consumption is probably more difficult. It may not be fair to compare with electric - heating losses may make gas apparently less energy efficient but this ignores the losses on electricity generation in a gas fuelled power station.
In all cases the largest variable may not be the method - more the quantity of water which is only heated as a means to transfer energy to the eggs. Using the optimum size of container with the minimum quantity of water will give the best result.
Alternatively take water out of the equation completely and fry them.