How's about this for a bit of lateral thinking?

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Phil Pascoe

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2012
Messages
28,807
Reaction score
8,470
Location
Shaft City, Mid Cornish Desert
Crows soaring through the sky with cigarettes in their beaks could become a familiar sight if an idea to clean up the streets takes off.

A pair of industrial designers from Amsterdam have come up with a plan to reward the birds with food for every cigarette butt collected. Ruben van der Vleuten and Bob Spikman were inspired after walking through a park blighted by *** ends.

Three quarters of filters from the six trillion cigarettes smoked each year end up in the environment, it is estimated. That is 750,000 tonnes of toxin-leaching butts that take up to ten years to decompose.

The designers believe that litter fines fail to change people’s habits, so some of our brightest birds could be recruited to do the dirty work.

They plan to train crows to use their “Crowbar” machine by initially putting food on to a platform that is eventually replaced by butts. The idea is that crows peck around and eventually knock a butt into the machine, when they are rewarded with a snack.

Finally cigarette butts are scattered close to the machine and the crow learns to pick them up to “pay” for food. After that, the inventors believe, the scavengers will seek out the butts that are easily found in their surroundings.

Quoted verbatim from The Times. :D
 
Sounds good to me. And when the crows have gathered up all the nasty butts littering the ground, they might learn to start helping themselves before the smokers have quite finished with them - which would provide a very clear incentive for giving up! (or maybe just for smoking indoors...)
 
In Amsterdam..... Are we not missing something a little more comical than birds addicted to nicotine :lol:
 
I thought everyone is vaping these days?

Certainly can't stop cigarettes, though. The recent WHO summit was mostly about how governments can make best use of the taxation, rather than any actual health incentives. "Tobacco is a useful source of tax revenue", according to the official WHO minutes...
 
I have only one thing against smokers. If they were not to blow their waste product into my breathing space I wouldn't mind it at all. If I were to treat them to the waste product of my favorite passtime they would get right upset!

They take in the smoke and eject it all over everyone. I down a couple of pints, BUT if I were to eject all over them they would tend to throw all their toys out of the cot. 8)

What's the difference? Their waste product makes my clothes and skin smell bleedin awful! (hammer)
 
That's just a brilliant situation to close your eyes and imagine. If it works - will they have to teach them to wait in line nicely at the snack dispenser?
 
Jonzjob":1xp5ea4x said:
What's the difference? Their waste product makes my clothes and skin smell bleedin awful! (hammer)
And yours wouldn''t? Have you not smelled a tramp?
I don't see the problem, really - You both have to go some distance away to a designated space to indulge and, if one doesn't want to experience said product, one simply avoids that area.
Smokers may be at the mercy of the breeze, but so are drivers with internal combustion engines... and I much prefer the smells of both to some of the stinking cack people order off the menu! :D

My worry with the birds is what the filters are made from and whether they are harmful. As I recall (which I should recall better, since I worked for Rothmans once), they're a super-fine fibrous material, a mixture of cotton and possibly glass fibre? Pretty sure that's harmful to anything with lungs.
 
Back
Top