Though I shall remind you in 20/30 years time of the economic cost when we will still be paying back the debt.
Please let's not have another round of rorshach style "better off dead than poor" comments - it didn't end well for him then, it won't end well now. His comments earned him quite a few replies branding him a "despicable human being".
here's just an example of one:
Hancock's Half Hour
I've made it clear multiple times that if we had had a hard lockdown (as is being tested now in Lebanon) early last year we would already be rebuilding, because covid would have been starved to a point of being much more easily managed, and the Nightingale centres (plus other quarantine centres) could have housed those infected.
I've called rorschach out on this multiple times and now he's sending me PM's trying to goad me into proving it - whelp - as he desires:
Hancock's Half Hour - no explanation required.
Hancock's Half Hour - a reply.
Hancock's Half Hour - my personal reply to that post (for full disclosure)
Hancock's Half Hour - a post by RogerS who also says he beleives rorschach is saying "let the old die" (bottom paragraph)
Hancock's Half Hour - Here he doubles down on his "save the economy, not lives" crusade.
Hancock's Half Hour - and another.
Hancock's Half Hour - LOL this didn't work out as he thought.
Hancock's Half Hour - and another reply
BINGO - I knew it was here somewhere -
Hancock's Half Hour - second paragraph
here is the important line:
"I am willing to let a tiny fraction of very elderly people die a little bit early for that to happen." (in reference to reducing the economic losses for people)
Read it and deny it rorshach - I could go on but I think that's enough.
oh go on then -
Hancock's Half Hour - another reply to rorschachs post
and on and on - that entire thread is FULL of other members tearing apart rorschachs claims of "evidence" the lockdown was pointless and then trying to recant a previous statement, EVEN when he's been bloody quoted back to himself!
Mods - before you think this is a witchhunt - rorshach PM'd me with: "Still waiting to see those screen caps you said you had, I'd like to see how accurate your paraphrasing is. "
all I've done is oblige and I'm only on PAGE 18 of that 60 page thread - I;ve read on soem more pages and there's plenty more like it:
https://www.ukworkshop.co.uk/threads/hancocks-half-hour.122775/post-1358902
Interestingly rorschach asked these questions:
Hancock's Half Hour
then another member invited him to put his own cards on the table:
Hancock's Half Hour
here he attempts to recant a previous (let them all die) statement (which I have proven above) :
Hancock's Half Hour
rorschachs "cards" -
Hancock's Half Hour - not exactly the kind of business that needs protecting at the cost of lives.
- another interesting viewpoint " I think those that suffer least are the ones claling for lockdown"
Hancock's Half Hour
and then admits his position despite previously claiming he had not:
Hancock's Half Hour
and a reply:
Hancock's Half Hour
Still not even halfway through the thread but i think I've proved my point rorschach.
EVERYTHING you said has been proven wrong - Covid kills the young and old, more old than young granted, but your beleif that's the lockdown was unnecessary has been flawed from day 1 - the last lockdown was almost a success - many countries that followed lockdown rules were down to only a few hundred new cases per day.
It's also now a moot point that lifting the lockdown too early caused this second wave - because it allowed the mutuated strain to get a foothold - and now we are at obscene levels of infections and deaths.
Your move.