A few years ago there was series in one of the American woodworking magazines which looked at "dream" workshops, it was the normal tool **** and not to be taken seriously. However one article really stuck in my memory.
It was about a guy who genuinely did go the extra mile! As I recall he had a very well paid job and he had a good amount of property. So he planned and had built a very big home workshop, maybe 150 square metres. I can't remember the exact dimensions, but it was bordering on being too big, where the inefficiency of commuting around the workshop would start to outweigh the advantages of all that clear space.
But the really remarkable thing was what he put inside his workshop.
He spent a long period, maybe a couple of years, researching what was the absolute finest woodworking machinery available. He attended trade shows all over the world to gather the information. He planned in meticulous detail how it should all be laid out, and then he pressed the button and put it all together. The result was amazing. I've seen a fair few top end commercial workshops, but they've always got at least a couple of not-so-great bits of kit. This guy's workshop was brand new, top of the range Altendorf and Martin throughout! At a guess I'd say he spent well over a quarter of a million dollars.
The article was at pains to emphasise that he was really using it all, and pointed to a couple of drawer chests that he'd made. I'm sure they were very nice drawer chests, but they looked like the sort of straightforward, rectilinear pieces of furniture that you can get in any high street.
I felt a bit conflicted reading the article. On the one hand it's his money and his time, so good luck to him. After all, no one is better placed than this guy to decide how best he should spend his own money in order to give himself the greatest pleasure and satisfaction. On the other hand, I couldn't help but feel it was all a bit out of balance? That the furniture produced was in no way proportionate to the resources invested. I did wonder if his real motivation was the pleasure that comes from specifying and equipping the workshop, rather than actually using it? And if so, I wondered what would happen a few years down the line? There'd be no more excitement from planning and buying, so would he suddenly look at the $250,000 of equipment and question if that was appropriate to make $2,500 of furniture?
I guess where I'm coming out is to think that for really enduring satisfaction, there should probably be at least some fit between what goes in (in terms of money, time, tools etc), and what comes out (in terms of number, quality, and complexity of finished projects).
I wonder if the most contented furniture makers are those who achieve the most from the least? But if so there's a hurdle to be overcome in getting to that happy situation, "the least" is the easy bit, it's achieving "the most" that's the harder part!