Is there a good reference source or sources on the appearance (good) and/or construction (great) of british architectural joinery over time?
After wondering about the history of the pleasingly simple and clean looking "One over Three" paneled door design which is frequently associated with 1920's and 1930's construction, and realised that I couldn't find a good reference source on the history of architectural joinery over time.
I've got electronic copies of Nicholson and Tredgold's "Practical Carpentry and Joinery" and Riley's "A Manual of Carpentry and Joinery", which are both excellent references, but both only reflect the practices and styles of the Victorian and Edwardian era which is only a narrow sliver of the history of making key components of buildings from wood.
I thought I was on to something with Eastwick's "The Design and Practice of Joinery" published by RIBA, unfortunately having got a copy, it turns out to be mainly appraising architects of the techniques and working practices of joiners, so they can avoid designing unfeasible items, or specifying too loosely and getting something wildly different from client expectations.
After wondering about the history of the pleasingly simple and clean looking "One over Three" paneled door design which is frequently associated with 1920's and 1930's construction, and realised that I couldn't find a good reference source on the history of architectural joinery over time.
I've got electronic copies of Nicholson and Tredgold's "Practical Carpentry and Joinery" and Riley's "A Manual of Carpentry and Joinery", which are both excellent references, but both only reflect the practices and styles of the Victorian and Edwardian era which is only a narrow sliver of the history of making key components of buildings from wood.
I thought I was on to something with Eastwick's "The Design and Practice of Joinery" published by RIBA, unfortunately having got a copy, it turns out to be mainly appraising architects of the techniques and working practices of joiners, so they can avoid designing unfeasible items, or specifying too loosely and getting something wildly different from client expectations.