Finishing Plane...

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SteveJ

Established Member
Joined
27 May 2009
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was just curious as to the consensus on the best plane to use solely for finishing. I've not a great deal of experience with all the many permutations of blade angle, bevel direction etc. I'm thinking along high angle, 60 to 95 degrees (plus?) sort of lines.... What would you guys recommend?
 
Steve
For a dedicated finishing plane you need a tight mouth, a high angle if you work timber with interlocked or tricky grain, and a sharp blade.
For bed angle I would recommend 55 to 60 degrees - any less isn't effective for interlocked grain, any high er and the plane becomes uncomfortable to push (and you get accelerated blade wear).
Hope this helps with your decision making,
Cheers
Philly :D
 
Philly":ip568ocq said:
Steve
For a dedicated finishing plane you need a tight mouth, a high angle if you work timber with interlocked or tricky grain, and a sharp blade.
For bed angle I would recommend 55 to 60 degrees - any less isn't effective for interlocked grain, any high er and the plane becomes uncomfortable to push (and you get accelerated blade wear).

You also get an increasingly poor surface :-(

A lower cutting angle gives a better cut. So it's a compromise between "general" surface quality, and avoiding tearout.

BugBear
 
Thanks for info everyone, seems I'll be looking at a 60 degree jobbie. Out of interest whats the score with scraper planes? Worth the investment for this application?
 
You'll get a superior finish with a plane, so plane when possible. Scrape when cornered :lol:
Hope this helps
Philly :D
 
Steve

Many seem to like the bevel up smoothers (possibly they have not tried a good quality bevel down smoother), I have the LV and it is a nice plane, but my 4.5s are generally much better smoothers (I use a 10 degree back bevel on one of them and standard angle on the other) and no wood has defeated them thus far.

The BU planes are easier to adjust the cutting angle (back bevels are easy to apply too) but they are a little light and tend to ride and skit over the surface if the blade is not razor sharp.

I find I have to sharpen the BU plane at least twice as often as the bevel down 4.5.

For the record, I really like my LV BU smoother and tend to use it on end grain.

How about a custom made Philly Plane with high angle? I have one and it is superb!
 
At West Dean '08 I presented the LN demonstrator with a lump of stuff that was almost impossible :evil: :evil: to plane. Out of all the LN planes on his bench (and he had the lot) he picked a low angle jack to do the job, with an effective pitch of 62deg - Rob
 
woodbloke":32dz8d1z said:
At West Dean '08 I presented the LN demonstrator with a lump of stuff that was almost impossible :evil: :evil: to plane. Out of all the LN planes on his bench (and he had the lot) he picked a low angle jack to do the job, with an effective pitch of 62deg - Rob

That may have been because he had already demonstrated the rest, and wanted to try and sell you a BU as well. :)
 
Whoa.. so many choices :eek: Alas a philly plane or any high-end commercial plane are out of my reach right now, too few pennies :oops:
I have a bevel-up Stanley block (220A if memory serves) which I love to bits, and I've just finished refurbing an Anat 4B (will have to get pics sorted) which I picked up at a car boot for the princely sum of £1.50 :p I've another number four, a very cheap nasty lil thing off of ebay that I'm hatching plans to 'modify', will try going down the back-bevel route and see what I end up with. I'm also expecting a delivery from Rutlands this week - a small Dakota Hong-Kong stylie plane with a 60 degree bed that I'm eager to test drive... One way or another I'll get the bases covered :D
 
Mikey R":27eso1vi said:
woodbloke":27eso1vi said:
At West Dean '08 I presented the LN demonstrator with a lump of stuff that was almost impossible :evil: :evil: to plane. Out of all the LN planes on his bench (and he had the lot) he picked a low angle jack to do the job, with an effective pitch of 62deg - Rob

That may have been because he had already demonstrated the rest, and wanted to try and sell you a BU as well. :)
There was no overt or even covert selling involved, this was a bit of a gauntlet thing as the timber concerned was the 'Wood from Hell' - Rob
 
SteveJ":zhmwy08r said:
Alas a philly plane or any high-end commercial plane are out of my reach right now, too few pennies :oops:

Resistance to The Slope is futile.....

DSCF1361.jpg


This Philly smoother is a cracker - and doubles as a scraper plane by simply reversing the blade.

Cheers

Karl
 
Philly wrote:
For bed angle I would recommend 55 to 60 degrees - any less isn't effective for interlocked grain, any high er and the plane becomes uncomfortable to push (and you get accelerated blade wear).

High cutting angles are pretty much the norm for me on interlinked grain. You can basically use anything on straight grained timber. Uncomplicated soft woods benefit from a lower cutting angle. These can leave a polished look that one does not wish to finish further!

For high cutting angles up and including 60 degrees, I will use both BU and BD planes. However the BU planes, with their lower centre of effort, work these high angles more easily (less effort) than BD planes. I will take the BU planes to 65 degrees and they will plane as effortlessly as a BD plane that is 10 degrees lower.

Here's my newest BD high angle smoother: Ron Brese made up a custom kit for me ... 60 degree bed, all-steel body. I infilled it with ebony, and added a few personal touches to the design. http://www.inthewoodshop.com/ToolReviews/TheBreseSmallSmootherKit.html

This is a small plane, based on Karl Holtey’s 11-S, and just 6 1/2" in length.

TheBreseSmallSmootherKit_html_28a5c2c2.jpg


TheBreseSmallSmootherKit_html_m5e1d940.jpg


Regards from Perth

Derek
 
Hi,:D
This is my solution for smoothing planes:
I modified ordinary BD planes (Stanley 3, 4 and Record 4 1/2) by adding a thicker blade from woodies. Cutting angle is 55° (10° back bevel).
user_22_immagine_025_1232200211_348871.jpg

user_22_immagine_029_1232200255_785219.jpg


Ciao,
Giuliano
 
woodbloke":1no0uu5j said:
Mikey R":1no0uu5j said:
woodbloke":1no0uu5j said:
At West Dean '08 I presented the LN demonstrator with a lump of stuff that was almost impossible :evil: :evil: to plane. Out of all the LN planes on his bench (and he had the lot) he picked a low angle jack to do the job, with an effective pitch of 62deg - Rob

That may have been because he had already demonstrated the rest, and wanted to try and sell you a BU as well. :)
There was no overt or even covert selling involved, this was a bit of a gauntlet thing as the timber concerned was the 'Wood from Hell' - Rob

I'd call that subtle selling of the first order :)

BugBear
 
Addressing the original question would a BU plane not be the most versatile as I have found with my LN62 using 30 and 45 degree blades. With that extra £30 you can smooth, shoot and high angle difficult grain. I haven't used my LV scraper since I bought it owing to the superior finish from the plane.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top