owen":gpwiilff said:Woody2Shoes":gpwiilff said:The thing is, in a building of this vintage, it's highly unlikely that any wall - internal or external - would be built without a dpc. And, as has already been mentioned, only slightly less unlikely that any dpc is not working substantially as well as it did on day one.Doug71":gpwiilff said:...The wall is really wet, the stair string against it has rotted and so have the skirting boards, I presume it has never had any kind of damp course in it.....
How old is the house? I don't think it's been mentioned?
owen":2wp0a11y said:How old is the house? I don't think it's been mentioned?
MikeG.":1z5uohke said:owen":1z5uohke said:........ What about older places with solid stone walls? Is tanking acceptable then? ......
Again, the lime mortar in the walls, and lime plaster internally, is what moderates the moisture content of these buildings. The key thing is to get all the fundamentals right (ground levels, service penetrations, no sources of concentrated damp, ventilation, etc), and to keep the materials consistent (avoiding gypsum-based plasters, for instance). I currently have a project on the go in Butterton, in your neck of the woods, having done 4 or 5 projects in the Peak District previously, all old stone buildings. There are no damp issues in any of the finished projects, and not a single DPC or DPM anywhere. The current project has a stream running under the flags of the kitchen floor. A torrent really, that you can hear even when the kettle is boiling. This house will be dry when we've finished, and there'll be no plastic or gypsum anywhere in the building. Tanking is never the answer, and lime plaster always is.
Suffolkboy":2iyiygm1 said:Timberwise are Shysters.
Enter your email address to join: