Just be aware you have no contract with Record, don’t be fobbed off with that one, the person who took your money is responsible for the performance of what they sold
Aidan
it is off topic for this discussion, but it must be hard for the manufacturers. a few decades ago, disc sanders were seriously expensive and massive bits of kit for large professional workshops. We now have a range of them starting at around £150 to say £250 aimed at various people including those using them for a hobby. I know that there have been advances and efficiencies in manufacturing, and in logistics etc, but accuracy and precision seems to cost more than they can justify spending on it. if they dont make something to put in the marketplace they lose a sale to a competitor, with the fairly significant risk that when the same buyer is looking for more equipment they are more familiar with the competitors offerings.
Ha ha - very droll! Poor manufacturers are justified in selling dross to those they gull because otherwise they might not be able to make loadsa money and some proper manufacturer would get the dosh instead.
Let's all stop making proper furniture and rush down to Ikea to buy their chipboard saggggers in case Mr Ikea can't buy his next yacht on time.
Eshmiel
That wasn't my point. My point is that the market demands these machines at a price point that a quality machine cannot be supplied for. You couldn't build the equivalent of an Axminster trade machine (currently 560 retail) and sell it for 200 retail. If you could they would reduce the spec and sell it for 100.
As for IKEA, the furniture may not last forever but it is sufficiently good for what it is designed for. Go and buy a dining table or a kitchen or a bed and they will be fit for purpose. You can eat your dinner, prepare your food, sleep in it accordingly. If a disc sander was make by IKEA, it would work perfectly well for 2-3 years and then let go rather than being poor to the point of being unusable from the beginning.
" There seems to be no law (in this country at least) preventing charlatans from duping suckers who will get no even break.
I disagree. There is plenty of IKEA furniture that has lasted for several years without falling apart. As much as I hate to admit it there are a couple of bookcases in my house left over from when we first moved in 10 years ago. One shelf has sagged a little because it is overloaded but none of the stuff has lost its coating and besides a scratch from moving house it looks the same as when new. It isn't aspirational furniture, and is only designed to last until the fashions change. You are correct that no part will be reusable but it is well designed and efficiently manufactured.
As for "the market", it is individual buying decisions. As a certain price point, each individual decides that they don't actually want the item enough to pay the going rate. The market demand is the amount of people prepared to pay X for an item, in this case a couple of hundred quid for a disc sander. The only way to make something that will retail at that sum is by cutting the spec to a minimum and manufacturing efficiently (often in China and sea freighted by the container load). In this case it seems that the spec has been cut too far since a flat disc and low runout are pretty fundamental.
Ok Eshmiel, why don’t you show us some of your pieces that are price comparable you those at IKEA, of course we expect you to remove operating margin before you make the comparrison, all yours, we are waiting to be amazed"The market" is not some natural phenomenon that "makes demands". It's a construct of humans, consisting of many things including misleading adverts and laws that tend to protect the seller more than the buyer, to a degree allowing sellers to lie about the quality of what they sell and often to get away with it when the buyer discovers that it doesn't function as promised. There seems to be no law (in this country at least) preventing charlatans from duping suckers who will get no even break.
Ikea furniture has a minimal functionality as it's not designed to last but rather to look fashionable for a period, generally until the fashion cycle cycles and the fashion victim "wants" the latest look. It will sagggg given the slightest excuse. It will shed it's plastic coating on the chipboard if you so much as stroke it. It will generally work imperfectly for 2 or 3 years (or months, if the children tug and bang at it).
**********
Part of the reason I make our own furniture and some for friends and family is that I (and sometimes they) prefer the old model goods - made to function well, look good and last for a very long time. Any fashion involved tends to be the sort that's become "classic" - i.e. been around for 50 - 300 years. Another reason is that I wasted quite a bit of dosh on cheap & nasty big store "furniture" in my youth and wish I hadn't. Still, it's all just damp chipboard rot somewhere now.
Even some very well made but rather fashion-conscious furniture - some models of which can be seen here in this forum - make me wary. I often wonder - how could that timber be reused when the owner decides that that "modern" piece no longer is and wants the latest style? Much of the reclaimed timber I like to use (it's often free, you know) comes from such furniture ......
Of course, no part of an Ikea item will be reusable, in all likelihood. Not unless SAGGG becomes a thing. "Watch you furniture gradually morph into an interesting chipboard sculpture, in post-modern style".
Eshmiel
Eshmiel - I would probably read your posts if they were a lot shorter and didn't resemble a lecture. I may not be alone.
Edit: crossed with Aiden.
Enter your email address to join: