Matt@":2s6yn213 said:
Anyway, what is the white Axminster machinery actually like? I've neither bought nor used any of it!
I am only a hobby user, but I regard it as generally good kit to the point where I will see what axminster have for machines, and compare that with the branded comparable items. I have had a planer which was excellent and I would not have sold it if the capacity was greater than 6", a thicknesser and a bandsaw (i think the one mentioned in this thread). All would fall into the trade catagory of the new branding, and I would rate all at 5/5, 5* or whatever the scoring system was. I dont know how the hobby stuff rates- I am reluctant to buy any of it, because I think it would be hard to move on afterwards- it is probably comparable to triton, charnwood, draper et al, which I would compare it to.
There are 2 similar threads going about axminster, so this may be more relevant to the other.
All of my purchases for machines are on the secondhand market, simply to maximise what I can get for my money. As most people, I would expect to pay 1/2 to 2/3 of the new price. I am at the stage where having bought good solid machines, I am upgrading for a bit more capacity. On axminster stuff, the prices going up a few percent each year helps me, because I do not typically lose any money when I sell, having kept them for a couple of years. In terms of pounds spent, it is a minor consideration- I probably spend £100 a year there on odd bits, but they do get considered for most of my purchases.
I dont dislike axminster at all, but for me they are only another supplier that I check when I am looking for something. I research extensively when buying something- often eve on simple things, and then purchase based on the lowest delivered price to my door. I dont doubt the "great customer service", but they are not exclusive on this, and I would be unlikely to buy something that was not price competitive just for this. There are many good suppliers out there.
As for producing their own tools, then I don't blame them at all for this- they should make much more money doing so, and should have the opportunity to improve the models that they are cloning. Sadly, I don't think that they always take this opportunity.