I work with evidence that exists, it’s pretty good. You work with whatever you fancy.
Nonsense - I suggested you parse the data and maybe examine what you're looking at. Your response is to imply that I'm not referring to data. A very typical internet jockey type response. Just want an answer, right? If it's meaningful, who knows...
It would appear that about 3000 TS injuries per year 20 years ago required admittance to a hospital. The remainder (92%) were generally lacerations and treatment and discharge. 3000 seems like a lot to me, but the US is five times the size of the UK.
I would assume that the injury rate is far less now due to a change in attitude, but I don't see updated data parsing injury types by occupational vs. not. If someone cuts their thumb and gets 5 stitches, that's not meaningful. It's not disabling. If there's an amputation, that's meaningful. If there's permanent disability, that's meaningful.
I don't personally use a TS much - constant use of a TS is generally (on a non-occupational basis) isn't really needed at all. When I use a TS, it's with push sticks (two) and a riving knife (which is standard on saws here now). I don't need a nanny to add more to the price and prefer the level of individual freedom here to there. If you want something like sawstop, it's easy to find. If you don't, it's easy to find.
If, on the other hand, someone is on a jobsite and their boss is forcing them to do something stupid or being negligent, that's a different thing and worthy of penalty and monetary settlement. That's not what we're talking about.