Cheshirechappie":2hyqt73t said:
Looks like a spokeshave progenitor, doesn't it - after all, a spokeshave is as near to being a small drawknife as makes very little difference.
Out of curiosity, I looked up the history of spokeshaves, and as far as I can tell, the tool as we know it today (blade set in wooden or metal holder) didn't really exist much before the 16th century. Given how useful such a tool is, it seems perfectly logical that a 'primitive' form existed before that - a two-handed knife being a bit more controllable and precise in it's results than a basic single-handled one. I'd imagine that using it could be a bit hard on the thumbs and fingers if used for a prolonged time, so it's eventual development into something more comfortable to use seems logical.
Bit of spokeshave history research here;
http://woodworkinghistory.com/glossary_spokeshave.htm
Good point CC. Hoping that nobody minds a little thread drift here, I'd like to put in a plug for the booklet "Wooden Spokeshaves" by Ken Hawley and Dennis Watts. It was jointly published by TATHS and The hawley Trust and is available for only £6 + p&p
here.
It mostly covers the way that the familiar tool was mass produced by hand in hundreds of variations, but a historical note is included as well. Raymond MacInnes found a 1510 reference but this booklet gives an earlier reference in an inventory of a wheelwright's tools made in
1454, which listed "1 spoke shave & 1 two hand shave value 2d."
[Just speculating here but I wonder if the 'two hand shave' was a draw knife - which has to be used in two hands - and the other shave is the familiar tool, which can just about be used single handed.]
You can read more about it in TATHS Journal no 2
here.