bjm
Naturally different
Hi Richard
The point I was trying to make was that I wouldn't consider wood at 20% to be thought of as 'dry'. For many woods fsp is ~25%mc.
There are two general types of wood decay wet rot and dry rot (ignoring soft rot for now). Wet rot does need a source of moisture to become established from spores and there will be a time lag where it will be competing for resources from other organisms. Decay does not initiate immediately so intermittent wetting is rarely a problem so long as the wood dries out fairly quickly. Decay only takes hold once the conditions are 'right' for the fungus.
Dry rot is a special case because, if established nearby (out of sight), it can grow and infest wood that is, to all intents and purposes, dry (in the region 10-16% depending upon ambient conditions). This fungus has the ability to transport moisture through it's hyphae to the growing front where decay is active - it doesn't need to re-establish itself from spores like other wood decay fungi. This is what makes it such a problem to remedy as you have to remove all the hyphae you can see, and then some! Ventilation is a good remedy because it doesn't like draughts and there are companies out there that treat dry rot by controlling the environment rather than using chemicals. There was a paper published about 30 years ago where they discovered that Protestant churches were less susceptible than Catholic churches to dry rot due to them being used during the week and disturbing the air too much for the fungus to get hold! (I'm recalling this from memory so may not recall all the details, or have the denominational susceptibility correct! - I will try to dig out the reference but I haven't worked on this for 20+ years now). It's an interesting fungus to work with.
The term 'dry rot' has been appropriated to cover all forms of fungal decay but the reality is far more interesting.
As I understand it, much of the wood we used to buy from across the pond used to be only partially dried on the assumption that it would dry down during the long voyage!! This would have been back in the 70's and is no longer the case today.
The point I was trying to make was that I wouldn't consider wood at 20% to be thought of as 'dry'. For many woods fsp is ~25%mc.
There are two general types of wood decay wet rot and dry rot (ignoring soft rot for now). Wet rot does need a source of moisture to become established from spores and there will be a time lag where it will be competing for resources from other organisms. Decay does not initiate immediately so intermittent wetting is rarely a problem so long as the wood dries out fairly quickly. Decay only takes hold once the conditions are 'right' for the fungus.
Dry rot is a special case because, if established nearby (out of sight), it can grow and infest wood that is, to all intents and purposes, dry (in the region 10-16% depending upon ambient conditions). This fungus has the ability to transport moisture through it's hyphae to the growing front where decay is active - it doesn't need to re-establish itself from spores like other wood decay fungi. This is what makes it such a problem to remedy as you have to remove all the hyphae you can see, and then some! Ventilation is a good remedy because it doesn't like draughts and there are companies out there that treat dry rot by controlling the environment rather than using chemicals. There was a paper published about 30 years ago where they discovered that Protestant churches were less susceptible than Catholic churches to dry rot due to them being used during the week and disturbing the air too much for the fungus to get hold! (I'm recalling this from memory so may not recall all the details, or have the denominational susceptibility correct! - I will try to dig out the reference but I haven't worked on this for 20+ years now). It's an interesting fungus to work with.
The term 'dry rot' has been appropriated to cover all forms of fungal decay but the reality is far more interesting.
As I understand it, much of the wood we used to buy from across the pond used to be only partially dried on the assumption that it would dry down during the long voyage!! This would have been back in the 70's and is no longer the case today.