Search results

How can the 'Laffer curve be nonsense'! What Art Laffer merely states, is that: There is an optimum level to set tax rates at in order to maximise tax revenues! That is self evident! If the tax rate is set at zero then the tax revenue is zero. If the tax rate is set at 100% then the tax...

Market forces consist of the dynamic relationship between buyers and vendors - when demand exceeds supply the vendor is in the driving seat and can command a higher price, when supply exceeds demand then the buyer is in the driving seat and can drive prices down. Both parties generally want to...

One of the big drivers of house prices in more recent years has been the near zero interest rates, this has allowed folk to easily borrow ever higher multiples of their income, thus pushing up the market price.

lol - and yet he still doesn't seem to stop and consider that maybe he has got it all wrong! 😂😂

No one is suggesting 'a casual attitude' so not sure why you feel the need to state that.... If a landlord needs his property back then he has every right to have it back once the terms of the original contract have been met and after a sufficient notice period has been given. If you remove...

As we have explained to you, only a tiny fraction of those evicted using the 'No Fault' eviction process are in reality not at fault, landlords usually use 'No Fault' evictions to get rid of their 'At fault' tenants because it's a far easier eviction process. The remaining small percentage of...

That's why landlords need the ability to evict.

That’s all well and good if the laws and regulations were stable, but they aren’t, successive governments have all adopted an anti-landlord stance and constantly increased regulation, increased taxes and steadily removed our property rights. I guess if politicians are trying to win votes in a...

Thats rather random - they are not the topic here, the topic is 'No Fault Evictions'.

No, let me set you straight, I provide very nice homes for people to live in so that I can make a profit. Do you expect me to do it for free? Not sure what you find toxic about wishing to earn a living and offering a good quality service in the process. Your response is odd.

But its not a free ride - there is a lot of hard work, risk and responsibility involved! Providing homes for others is not a task that should be take lightly! - maybe you should try it some time then you may actually understand what we are talking about!

If you were paying attention then you would have learnt that I own 6 rental properties, 2 of which I bought and renovated and 4 of which I built in their totality myself. But even those who buy to rent are still providing a home to those who need or have to rent as they own that property, it is...

The majority of tenants who are evicted via a Section 21 'no fault' eviction are actually in reality "at fault", its just easier for a Landlord to use a Section 21 than a Section 8 notice. So when you hear all these statistics bandied around about tenants being evicted through no fault of their...

Then maybe you should show a bit more respect to those of us who actually provide homes for others to live in.

Socialists don't tend to care much for the property of others.

I doubt he would be allowed to rent his house out if it has single glazed windows as it wouldn't achieve an EPC of 'C' or above. It sounds like we provide a better standard of accommodation to our tenants than Jacob supplies to his wife! 😂😂

Of course its someone else's home, and in my 25 years of letting I have never evicted anyone. My tenants love me as a landlord and I have provided accommodation for hundreds of people over the years some who have made their homes in my property for over a decade. I find it funny that those who...

Is yours an old draughty house with single glazed windows? As landlords we are required that all our rental properties reach an Energy Rating of 'C' or above - this means that cavity wall and loft insulation are essential, as is double glazing etc. This creates an extremely warm and draught...

No one is suggesting that tenants don't have rights, and no is suggesting a landlord shouldn't take into account the tenants situation in a sympathetic manner. But the fact remains that the house is the property of the landlord - and if that ultimate control is removed or stifled to an...

Yes they should, its their property.