Search results

All I'm quoting are the rules regarding the offence of driving over footpaths which do not have lowered kerbs. That is why anyone parking on/over a footpath is liable to a fixed penalty fine if spotted by a warden etc. In towns where parking is very restricted by such as yellow lines, people...

Had my booster last Sunday. I'm in the high risk category and I was waiting for information from my GP surgery but nothing happened and as the six month period had expired I looked up the NHS website and found a walk in centre about 14 miles from me. That only took about a good twenty minute...

Regarding SORN. I have one vehicle which is regularly SORN'd and it's always been parked on my drive. However, the owner of a vehicle is liable to prosecution for parking their vehicle even on their own their garden if the garden doesn't have dropped curbs for driveway access. It's against the...

Yeah, like the huge majority who voted for the Conservatives are all racists and xenophobes!

So the vast majority who voted for the Conservatives at the last election were effectively all racists and xenophobes? Hmmm an interesting perspective!

It's just a pity that those who were so vocal about remaining in the EU weren't also so vocal with regard to the effect the uncontrolled migration policies of the EU had on many of the poorest already living in our society! The poorest arguably were the ones who bore the brunt of the demand for...

. Do you really think I'd put myself up for ridicule from pompous ***** who are clueless but who think they know everything because they've read an editorial on Wikipedia or in some other science magazine? That's not how I work. I research the facts and data evidence first and then decide if the...

As far as I'm concerned Mann is the Andrew Wakefield of climate science!

I'm not asking trick questions. I'm not anxious to prove anything, I'm merely questioning some the science held up as fact and the beliefs of people like yourself who attempt to shut down anyone who dares to even question the data and modelling and who place everyone in the denier pigeon hole...

OK. So based on your comments and unswerving faith in science, it's safe to assume from what you say that if it wasn't for the intervention of anthropogenic origin CO2 and its effect on the climate, then we would could well be in the grip of an ice advance right now...is that how you see it...

As an unswerving believer, you must believe that anthropogenic generated CO2 is entirely responsible for any observable shift in our climate that we see today, am I correct?

Classic.

A cartoon drawn by Friends of the Hockey Stick Lovers if I'm not mistaken. The name Katharine Hayhoe at the foot of the page, Mann's sidekick, tells me all I need to know.

So show the quantifiable relationship between CO2 and warming and explain the 'reversals' as found in proxy records in terms of CO2.

Talking of boorish. Can you explain why over the last 15,000 years there have been around 10 sudden climatic reversals documented in the the proxy records which clearly did not involve anthropogenic CO2 production?

Flatter myself? Not in the least. I've only recently joined the thread, it was well underway long before I arrived on the scene. The content interested me so I joined in. If you aren't interested in the debate then fair enough. I myself don't read every thread or have any interest in many of the...

I hadn't realised that forum members were obliged to read every thread and every post? I thought the clue was in the title... 'Off-Topic'!

By all means press it. I have too much to do and too little time to waste it trying to debate with someone with entrenched views so you will be doing me a favour.(y)

AGW has been like manna from heaven for countless thousands of academics worldwide in the form of almost limitless research grants over the past two or more decades. Why on earth would they want to change the current status quo by questioning the facts surrounding the GW god and its resultant...

Believe what you want, it really doesn't bother me. As I've previously stated, your credibility is nil as far as I'm concerned. It says it all when anyone quotes Wikipedia as a reliable source of information! It's open source information and there are people out there who can deliberately edit...