Talk about being stitched up - thanks Chris :shock: :roll: :roll: .
The problem that occurred for me was not so much a reaction between the oak and SS but the fact that SS can be quite brittle (which I now know).
I made an oak table and benches last summer for a client.
Some of the leg components were held together using SS screws so that they could be plugged and hidden (client's request!). Having used this type of construction before (although not SS) I was confident that it would do the trick.
Anyway, even though clearance holes and pilot holes were correctly made it appears that the torque used to tighten them was too high (although never experienced any probs with any other fixings at this level) and started an invisible shearing process.
Got a call late one evening from the client (about a week after delivery!) saying that part of one of the legs was a bit wobbly, went over the next day perplexed to find that all of the screws bar one in one leg panel had sheared and only required a small pressure to break the final screw.
Given that the table was designed to be collapsible and semi portable, the strength of the structure is reliant on the integrity of all components working together, but obviously critical is the strength of the legs parts. As I was checking the other legs I noticed that all of them had failed in some way so I realised that it was a combination of possible design failing and screw quality.
In the workshop I tried to recreate the problem to see what had gone wrong and used ordinary steel screws and SS ones. The SS ones sheared MUCH more easily than the steel ones. Anyway the problem is now resolved and I have used SS coach bolts instead.
Was it the oak or the torque or a faulty batch? Who knows but I don't think I'll use the same method again.
If you are interested - these were the screws:
http://www.screwfix.com/app/sfd/cat/pro.jsp?ts=53724&id=50896
Cheers
Tim