Hollow form for critique

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Harlequin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2008
Messages
386
Reaction score
0
Location
Leeds
Well........ hollowish ,only 5" in dia and 4" in height of the spalted beech.
cocobolo,sycamore and ebony used as seen.
Finish - Chestnuts melamine lacquer and wax elsewhere
Critique and ideas to improve appreciated.



 
I would'nt be qualified to comment or suggest improvments, but I can say that I like what I see
Well done if it pleases you thats what matters IMO.
REgards Boysie
 
very nice,

just a shame the pierced detail on the finial isn't regular, kinda spoiled it for me when i zoomed in on it.

Sorry - im being very critical today - even my breakfast has some issues with it ...................
 
It's a nice piece. I really like the pierced detail on the final and the shape of the little top cone,

I have only two minor criticisms.

The top shape of the main form - which looks as though the curve has a bit of a flat to it towards the edge of the piece (although this may just be the limitations of seeing a photo rather than the real piece).

The top part of the finial - here the change where the thicker, more bulbous center part meets the narrow top stem seems a bit too abrupt and I'd rather see it as a smoother overall curve.
 
Hi

its a like / no like for me as below

The body shape is good and the foot sits / fits well to the body

The lower section of the lid is also good ,
from then on up it does not work ,
the spiraling / carving is a bit irregular and the join between the 3 sections need to flow ,
at the moment it gives the impression that the finial has been cut in half and the spiral section has been added , no flowing joins

Maybe have another go at a lid assembly

with the lid sorted you will have a excellent item

Thanks for showing us :mrgreen:
 
agree with the comments about the finial - my thoughts exactly
the pierced part was intended to be irregular however I do see now that it can be improved.
the main form is fine really - no flat on the top bit,must be the pic
 
Back
Top